Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12; Chgogal
I referenced the negative aspects of "logistics" in one of my previous posts, and I think this is an example of just that:

"...Create a simple kit that allows women to self-test for urinary or vaginal infections without having to approach a company medic, often a man, about symptoms..."

Are these "simple kits" going to take the place of battle dressings or ammo on a critical resupply? And is there going to have to be a female medic in every unit that has a female in it?

These are "the turd in the punch bowl" questions that Phyllis Schlafly would ask, but they probably aren't looking for her input.

And again, these types of questions, though small, aren't going to sway a decision in any way. It is going to happen come hell or high water.

465 posted on 06/16/2012 10:47:27 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The safest road to Hell is the gradual one." Screwtape (C.S. Lewis))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
I hope men don't mind visiting a f medic in combat should they need their private parts examined.

http://www.emtcity.com/topic/11487-19-year-old-female-medic-receives-silver-star-in-afghanistan/

http://forums.military.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6281963544/m/5770076371001

You would think there is some professionalism at the Ranger level, but maybe not.

468 posted on 06/16/2012 10:55:35 PM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. TY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson