Posted on 06/14/2012 10:01:13 PM PDT by Perseverando
David has proven that the WA transcript is a forgery, if you chekc his comments you’ll probably see it (he’s done it more than once, one time pretty recently).
Courtesy ping to David.
He is very familiar with the dates in question and they could not have happened. There are other reasons too.
Also, if you read (or re-read) the “Auntie” thread, you will see the glaring, gaping holes in the “Stanely had a brand new baby and went to Washington” bedtime story.
Oops, forgot the courtesy ping to David.
I have read much of your writing, and I have always been impressed with your clarity of thought and knowledge of the information being discussed. I regard you as a valuable contributor to this topic, and I look forward to reading what you have to write in the future.
Intelligent and reasonable people can occasionally disagree, and so I shall regard this difference of opinion as one such occasion. Perhaps we will all eventually figure out the truth of this issue, and then we can laugh about our past disagreements.
Apparently he had one other son. Barry Obama and you are blind .
That’s the irony in it.
You put up two pictures of the professional exotic model, Marcy Moore, and two pictures of the amateur exotic model, Stanley Ann Dunham, and then tried to claim they are the same person. They are not. (This is the same lie perpetrated by the hardcore-leftist disinformation site, snopes.com, BTW.)
He has the same girl all over his video
Yes, the same girl being Stanley Ann Dunham. He does not have the images of Marcy Moore that you have posted to this thread in his video.
Here is the video:
I have no interest in naming the model
Yes, I have noticed that you withhold information when it could help someone prove you wrong. Her name is Marcy Moore and anyone reading this thread can go look for pictures of her and see she is not the woman photographed in F M Davis' home. That woman was Anne Dunham.
I DARE YOU. THIS GIRL POSED FOR EROTIC MAGAZINES FOR YEARS!
When you scream like this, you appear unhinged. Try making your points without seeming like a crazy person -- it might help you not seem like a crazy person. Hope this helps.
There’s really only one reason why anyone would insist that the model and Stanley Ann Dunham are the same person, and that is to place Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii, in bed with Frank Marshall Davis, thereby to infer that they were the parents of zero - to confer US citizenship on zero, and/or make the vain attempt to show Stanley Ann Dunham was in Hawaii before there is any physical evidence of her...the first we SEE of her is around 1963, holding a child about two or three years old. It’s the same issue with the ‘when did she graduate from Mercer Island’ question. It had to be 1960, didn’t it?
So she could get on an aircraft with her mother and fly to Hawaii as soon as she graduated...so she would be there in time to meet the kenyan native and fall in love and have a baby...but as that is falling apart, Frank Marshall Davis will do.
Your comments to me are repetitive and boring, and show not a little desperation.
Why were you insisting that Stanley anne Dunham and Marcy Moore are the same person?
that is to place Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii, in bed with Frank Marshall Davis
Okay, if you say so.
to confer US citizenship on zero
It doesn't confer anything on Zero. That would be dependent on where he was born and who, if anyone, was the father of record at the time.
attempt to show Stanley Ann Dunham was in Hawaii before there is any physical evidence of her
there are nude photos of S A Dunham from 1960 which are evidence she was physically in Hawaii at the time. That is corroborated by school records from University of Hawaii indicating she was attending classes there at the time.
we SEE of her is around 1963, holding a child about two or three years old.
How are those photos physical evidence? Is there DNA on them? How do you know those photos aren't photos of Marcy Moore holding a black baby? How do you know they aren't photoshopped?
It’s the same issue with the ‘when did she graduate from Mercer Island’ question
No, it is not.
It had to be 1960, didn’t it?
No, it didn't.
Your comments are repetitive, boring and nonsensical -- and show more than a little desperation.
Firstly, I have very rarely mentioned the name Marcy Moore, I prefer to refer to the girl as 'the model' - Snopes has been reported as naming the 'the model' Marcy Moore, but I believe Snopes has removed that information. Not that it matters one iota, the girl remains 'the model' regardless of what her name might be.
And I think you might be living in Wonderland with Alice. I knew that model wasn't Stanley Ann Dunham the first time I set eyes on her, and traced her to free-vintage-porn.com years ago.
Now I suggest you get off my back, your methods aren't working. I'm an Aussie, not a Democrat or a Republican, just an interested observer. You can't rattle me.
So I take it that he resembles both Stanley Armour Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis and that must mean Stanley Ann Dunham was his mother?
I really just WISH people who make these statements would use more than ONE IMAGE. If zero resembles either of these two men, then I am the result of a coupling between a hedgehog and an umbrella...(laughing)
We also have freepers who sincerely believe that the son of Frank Marshall Davis is the spitting image of zero...
So far I have not seen one atom of evidence that any naked photos so far linked or posted on FR are photos of SAD. None. Just some photos that bear a slight resemblance to her, and some that bear no resemblance at all. Like the Gilbert video. No resemblance whatsoever.
No other evidence.
Your insistence that some naked photos (or all?) are indeed, for sure, proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, SAD, is so fanatical, so desperate, that you appear very desperate and borderline OCD. Or maybe over the borderline way deep into the territory.
If you could show some evidence - names, photos of FMD and SAD together, some contemporaneous evidence - then your theory might - just might - carry some weight. But no, nothing - not a thing - other than some naked photos of a woman with a somewhat large chin. Who has a long upper lip and different nose than SAD. Not a single pinch, atom or iota of evidence.
Do you realize how tissue thin - wet tissue paper thin - your argument really is?
And - just for the sake of argument - just suppose some of the photos are her. So effing what? That has nothing to do whatsoever with the origin of the man in the White House. There is even less than no evidence that either one of them are connected with his nativity.
Your motives are really odd, very very odd.
Yet on this thread, you were posting pictures of Marcy Moore side-by-side with pics of Ann Dunham and claiming they were the same person.
If you could show some evidence - names, photos of FMD and SAD together,
There are photos of SAD naked on FMD's furniture. that's pretty compelling.
That has nothing to do whatsoever with the origin of the man in the White House.
Sure it does. They are photos of his mother naked in a man's home eight months before his birth. That strongly suggests said man is the father, particularly when you consider the two men bear a strong familial resemblance.
I posted a composite image of the same MODEL - one, the tinted image when she was evidently somewhat younger, and the other a black and white image in which she had aged a little and was wearing more lipstick.
AND I CALLED HER THE MODEL.
What are you? Knave or Nincompoop?
Wrong. You posted two images of Marcy Moore and two images of Stanley Ann Dunham — two different models. And then you incorrectly claimed they were the same person. You are evidently very confused and very poor at facial recognition.
If that furniture is known to be FMD’s (never heard or saw that assertion before), still has nothing to do with who the woman was.
And also, what evidence do you have that SAD is the mother of the man in the White House?
I’ve never seen any, and I’ve read threads about his background since summer 2008, as many threads as I saw and could find.
And BTW - being very insistent is not the same thing as being correct. Just letting you know.
Sure it does. They are photos of his mother naked in a man’s home eight months before his birth. That strongly suggests said man is the father, particularly when you consider the two men bear a strong familial resemblance.
Now we’re veering into “they’re coming to take me away Ha Ha” territory.
Resemblance? FMD and the man in the White House? No wonder you think the naked photos are of SAD. Two eyes, chin, mouth, nose - voila! Looks just like the other one!!
And, pray tell, what evidence do you have of the date of birht of the man in the White House? I’d really like to see some hard evidence of his DOB. You have some, cool! Show us!
I think someone by accident left the door unlocked at a loon bin. Or left their laptop in the ward and some patients are using it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.