[Exmil_UK]

I think you underestimate the number of dirty old men who keep these kinky mags for generations. I would not be surprised in the least if the website just scanned original magazines.

Unlike old newspapers, these things get kept :-)

In terms of needing to see the original source magazines, I agree, only the original physical copies are of any true legal value for evidence.

[Fred Nerks]

So you get your hands on the original magazines in which you assume the images first appeared, and you attempt to show that a girl with a very limited resemblance to Stanley Anne Dunham posed for erotic pictures in the house of Frank Marshall Davis, and while he photographed her, he seduced her, she became pregnant to him at the age of seventeen, but her father and mother didn’t object, neither did his wife who remained married to
him until ten years later, and Stanley Ann Dunhams parents found her a black kenyan native to act as a surrogate father, and the result was an offspring who looks nothing like either men.
And there’s still no physical evidence of Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii until 1963.
GOTCHA. It all makes perfectly good sense now.

I’ve been here far too long, I started researching from the time of the two LONG THREADS IN 2008 & 2009

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?q=1&;page=1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=1

And if you would like to follow some background research, you’ll find it here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2278969/posts