I don’t have an argument, I have a pair of eyes, I knew from when I first traced the images of the model to the free-vintage-porn.com website years ago - that the girl pictured, to whom I refer as ‘the model’, was nothing like Stanley Ann Dunham. And it’s rather telling isn’t it, that the entire website has been scrubbed of images since the Gilbert film was produced.
Believe what you like, I can’t force you to see what you don’t want to see. The model isn’t Stanley Ann Dunham and you need to ask yourself, who does it serve to have you believe it does?
And why the promotion of the falacy just now, when those images have been all over the web for YEARS?
Is their house of lies starting to fall down, and ANY ‘father’ will do, as long as it’s someone who was in Hawaii?
Remember, I’m an Aussie, I’m neither a Dem nor a Rep, I’m not a voter, I’m just an observer and I hate seeing your country hoodwinked.
Nonsense. You're blinded by your own sense of self-importance on trying to establish yourself as some sort of ace debunker. It's not serving you well in the least.