Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Learning our way on open carry(OK)
tulsaworld.com ^ | 17 June, 2012 | Janet Pearson

Posted on 06/18/2012 4:31:22 AM PDT by marktwain

Sean Michael Combs is probably like a lot of 18-year-old young men, except maybe for the M-1 rifle slung across his back.

The Troy High School student was arrested April 13, according to the Detroit News, after strolling down the street in the Detroit suburb of Birmingham with the weapon strapped on his back. He now faces three misdemeanor charges, according to the newspaper, "for brandishing a weapon, resisting and obstructing police, and disturbing the peace - each punishable by up to 93 days in jail."

After the arrest, Birmingham Police Chief Don Studt acknowledged Combs had a legal right to carry his gun, but added, "this guy was creating a disturbance and he wouldn't cooperate."

Fellow gun enthusiasts, all of them openly carrying weapons, gathered together last week and marched to City Hall to rally behind the teen. Advocates called for the charges to be dropped and for more training of law enforcement on gun rights, among other things.

Though there were no incidents arising out of the protest, and though it was certainly their right to protest, there still was something unsettling, even kind of frightening about seeing a parade of gun-toting people marching down the street.

We're being watched Is this kind of thing in store for Oklahoma when our new open-carry law goes into effect on Nov. 1? Are conflicts between police and gun-carriers inevitable? Are protests, lawsuits, and other such ramifications on the horizon for us?

Even before the law has become effective, gun-rights advocates have made it clear they'll be keeping an eye on Oklahoma. Reacting to comments from some members of Oklahoma law enforcement, advocacy leaders have declared they "will be watching the police" and will take appropriate actions they deem necessary to protect the right to open carry.

After several failed attempts, Oklahoma lawmakers last session passed an open-carry law that essentially allows anyone who has a concealed-carry permit to also openly carry their weapon.

The legislation prompted a welcome note from OpenCarry.org, a national advocacy group claiming to have more than 28,000 members, which joined with the Oklahoma Second Amendment Association (known as OK2A) to also issue a warning.

"Though we are disappointed that the Oklahoma Legislature saw fit to require a license to open carry, this reform is still a great step forward for freedom and self-defense rights. But we are also alarmed that some Oklahoma law enforcement officials seem ready to hijack the license requirement as an excuse to violate gun owners' Fourth Amendment rights," said a joint press release from the two organizations.

The statement cited published comments attributed to Midwest City Assistant Chief Sid Porter: "Midwest City police will check for permits when they encounter someone openly carrying a gun. ... If we see someone carrying a weapon in a holster, they have to have a permit on them and would be asked to show it. Anybody with a weapon on their side is considered a suspicious person."

OpenCarry.org co-founder and spokesman John Pierce had this response: "Earth to Oklahoma police: In the United States, guns are not contraband, and gun ownership is not suspicious."

The two advocacy groups called on Attorney General Scott Pruitt and law enforcement leaders to "ensure that all Oklahoma law enforcement officers are reminded that gun, or no gun, the Fourth Amendment requires at least 'reasonable articulable suspicion' of crime afoot before they may seize any person. And this goes for license checks as well."

Police may not seize or detain someone openly carrying a weapon "just to demand production of a license to carry," the two groups maintain.

Tim Gillespie, director and founder of the Oklahoma Second Amendment Association, declared: "We will be watching the police, and if need be, we will conduct open carry freedom of movement exercises and file lawsuits if we detect unconstitutional practices aimed at chilling the right to open carry."

The two groups even offered some training scenarios for Oklahoma law officers. A motorist stopped for suspicion of violating a traffic law, for example, can legally be asked to produce a permit if the officers sees an openly displayed weapon - because the stop was based upon reasonable suspicion of an offense.

But according to the groups, in the above scenario the officer may not legally disarm the motorist for some reason such as checking the weapon's serial number, unless the officer has probable cause to check the gun or feels the motorist is "presently dangerous."

The few scenarios outlined by the advocacy groups illustrate just how many diverse situations such as these could arise, day in and day out, once the new law goes into effect.

Study time If the events unfolding in the Detroit area are typical, then it looks like we'll likely have our share of protests, court cases and controversies.

There's little reason to fear that open carry will result in shoot-outs and tragedies. Most states already allow some form of open carry and there hasn't been an outbreak of gunplay across the country. And, knowing how difficult it is to get a permit to carry a gun, I suspect most gun-carriers are responsible, law-abiding people.

But this change in the law has left some folks a bit nervous, mainly because we don't know exactly what to expect. The advocacy groups make a good point: It would be in everyone's best interests for not only law enforcement but also open-carriers to study up on the law, so as to keep future conflicts at a minimum.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: banglist; combs; ok; opencarry
If you cannot exercise your rights with out fear of arrest, your rights are being taken from you.
1 posted on 06/18/2012 4:31:28 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

2 posted on 06/18/2012 4:40:51 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Lib vs. Con -- 2nd Amendment
3 posted on 06/18/2012 4:52:32 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Nice. Worth watching.


4 posted on 06/18/2012 5:01:30 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

there still was something unsettling, even kind of frightening about seeing a parade of gun-toting people marching down the street.

Likely what loyalist to King George felt in pre-revolutionary America.


5 posted on 06/18/2012 5:06:48 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I like open carry. I think it bad strategy to be "in your face" about it.

They used to have "open carry" in California. Then a bunch of people got into pushing the envelope, open carrying in ways that alarmed people, and California passed AB 144 banning open carry as of Jan 2012.

Here in PA, we have open carry. I like the fact, but mainly so that I'm covered in case I'm carrying concealed and my t-shirt rides up so that it's momentarily visible and some old lady freaks.

6 posted on 06/18/2012 5:14:25 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I guess it was bad not to leave the lunch counter and not move to the back of the bus.


7 posted on 06/18/2012 5:23:59 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
That all depends upon who is in charge. Context is everything
1960 - evil bad white man

2012 - wonderful benevolent black man

8 posted on 06/18/2012 5:39:10 AM PDT by Tupelo (TeaParty member, but no longer a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
...there still was something unsettling, even kind of frightening about seeing a parade of gun-toting people marching down the street.

Dear Janet, you better not visit the states where open carry is legal, and be really careful in states where concealed carry is legal, and really really watch out where states don't even require a concealed carry license.

Not to mention states where the lawless don't even bother with such a stupid thing such as a permit.

9 posted on 06/18/2012 5:52:26 AM PDT by CPOSharky (zero slogan: Expect less, pay more. (apologies to Target))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
I guess it was bad not to leave the lunch counter and not move to the back of the bus.

I'm talking about what kind of moves will increase our effective 2nd Amendment rights, versus moves that will alienate public opinion enough to lead to restrictions.

Right now, what should be on the front burner is passing "Stand Your Ground" in more states, passing "Shall Issue" CCW in the remaining restricted states (New Jersey would be a big win, since it adjoins New York), and pushing for "shall issue" approvals for Class III (full auto and silencers) applications.

10 posted on 06/18/2012 6:13:46 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

It seems clear to me that pushing open carry in Wisconsin was largely responsible for getting such a good shall issue ccw law there.


11 posted on 06/18/2012 6:31:42 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I can’t believe anyone will even notice, I see guys carrying all the time at the pizza shop and lunch counter with low drag, 7 pocket mall ninja pants and dark blue T shirts, with no visible badges, (Tulsa Cops don’t need no steenkin badges) and no one gives them a second glance. A glock in a blackhawk sherpa holster just doesn’t attract attention an longer. So why worry, don’t draw attention and, who will care?

(DO NOT assume I am encouraging impersonating)


12 posted on 06/18/2012 6:34:09 AM PDT by Duke_Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Midwest City, OK police chief Brandon Clabes, member of the IACP.

There’s the problem right there.


13 posted on 06/18/2012 6:43:29 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch (Rush Limbaugh, the Winston Churchill of our time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Is there a legal definition of “Shall not be infringed”?
14 posted on 06/18/2012 6:48:35 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
I guess it was bad not to leave the lunch counter and not move to the back of the bus.

I lived in Mississippi during the "civil rights'' movement and I never saw a lunch counter on a bus. :-)

15 posted on 06/18/2012 8:06:42 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson