Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilosopherStone1000
Excellent analysis--very helpful, and hopeful.

Emotions can run high on all these SC issues--and "states rights" is a HUGE issue.

Yet on this one, I think SCOTUS is agreeing that "immigration" IS a Federal issue, and states cannot pass laws that supercede or infringe on those laws.

However, as I hope Scalia's dissent will point out, the frustration the States have with this President's failure to enforce Federal law needs to be addressed. And perhaps the best way to address this concern would be for the states--and Congress--to bring to the Court a direct and immdeiate challenge to the UNCONSTITUTIONALITY of an Executive Branch order that blatantly declares the intent to NOT uphold Federal law!

324 posted on 06/25/2012 8:19:40 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: milagro

Depending on Scalia’s dissent, that may embolden the States to do just that.

Unfortunately (or fortunately), the SCOTUS won’t be in session again until just about time to vote the current WH resident out.


337 posted on 06/25/2012 8:28:59 AM PDT by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson