**********************************************************
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a constitutional challenge to a central provision of Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration law, clearing the way for similar legislation to take effect in other states and advancing a political narrative that could give President Barack Obama an added boost from Latino voters in November.
That provision, requiring police to conduct immigration checks on individuals they arrest or merely stop for questioning whom they suspect are in the U.S. illegally, does not appear to violate the Constitution by intruding on the federal government’s powers to control immigration, the court said.
All eight justices who ruled on the case voted to allow the mandatory immigration-check requirement to go into effect.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77789.html#ixzz1yoyU2xlN
The central premise of the law remains in effect and that is to round up and (legally) dispose of illegal aliens
And I’ll keep asking: Who is going to deport them?
Say a 29 year old illegal college student is working part time as a mule. He gets pulled over for a broken tail light and there are 5 others in the car. His status is checked and it’s determined he is here illegally. But, since he’s under 30 he can’t be deported. The other five illegals in the car? It’s not their car so they haven’t broken the law so, therefore, their status isn’t even checked.
Some village has been missing an idiot for nearly a month now.
Janet Napolitano just announced they would no longer accept calls from AZ cops on matters of status. Defacto Law, the best kind, since it has no appeal.