Sorry, but this is wishful thinking of the worst kind. There’s a greater likelihood that SCOTUS would uphold the mandate than vote against it unanimously. Besides, all the people who know these things say that Ginsberg wrote the dissent. If there’s a dissent, it isn’t unanimous.
…not necessarily.
The decision to allow the AZ police to check the immigration status of anyone who comes in contact with the law, was unanimous. The rest of the law recieved different levels of dissent. Scalia, supported letting the whole law stand.
Ginsberg said ‘people who talk don’t know’. She talked so she doesn’t know!
If Ginsberg is writing the dissent and Roberts the majority opinion,if that’s true, then we can be confident that the individual mandate, at the very least, is toast. Do you have a source on this (Ginsberg writing for the minority)?