[My hearts in London - Everett]

Since you don’t give credence to Natural News, how about the following one which was Natural News’ source.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm

Natural News cited their source in the article. This was not their bias or slant on this factual information.

[allmendream]

They are wackjob conspiracy theorists of the worst sort - engaged in anti-technological mysticism.

Their bias (and insanity) is apparent from this...

“vaccines are actually formulated to keep the outbreaks going”

Can you defend that bit of insanity?

I think it would be pretty apparent if a significant percentage got Mumps and spread it after receiving an inoculation against Mumps - but then again I am not a whack job insane loon with an agenda against actual medicine of proven efficacy based upon known molecular interactions.