So what ARE your comments?
Don’t forget the guy who set up the whole scenario - Baraq Hussein mohammed 0bama. If I didn’t firmly believe that he was a minion of the devil, I would probably prefer the devil over him.
He doesn’t exist to me anymore. He spit on us,I spit on him.I printed out a change of party form yesterday and will fill it out today.I am becoming an independent.
Roberts is completely wrong. A nationalized healthcare system is not one of the Federal government’s enumerated powers. There are a lost of other problems with his ruling but this one is the most obvious.
The NEXT Scotus travesty may be coming from Alito the other special gift by George Bush..
I’ve been waiting for hanky panky from both of them(roberts and alito)..
Kennedy finally does something right and honorable
AND Roberts replaces him as stealth traitor..
The republican operatives on many official fronts are brain damaged or ringers or even shills..
UNLESS the Obama FBI is paying them visits with offers they cannot refuse..
Something is not right on Capitol Hill in the republican camp..
There be traitors in the stew..
** Its obvious the FBI is tainted or penetrated with Obama shills.. no doubt the rest of the national security structure as well..
Almost.
I’m guessing Roberts has been pwned since before the super-secret double-swearingin a few years ago.
Bet he was the only justice Hussein could trust at that point.
What was WITH that stupid second swearing in, did we ever get the real story on that?
A Republican-appointed judge betrays the Constitution, yet we have fools claiming the decision was the proper one that has good things in it. Meanwhile, the country keeps drifting toward tyranny.
BS!
According to Rush Limbaugh, the court allowed the mandate to be characterized on the first day of arguments as a "mandate" (because if defined as a tax, the case could not have proceeded before the tax was actually levied). Henceforth, it was characterized as a tax.
IOW, Contradictory definitions are perfectly legal in Roberts' Kangaroo Court.
If it were a Tax bill, it would have stated as such. If it were a Tax bill, Roberts could have not ruled on it. Bovine Scat !
the author claims he gives the news in black and white no color added
that is impossible today
so you know when they say that they have no culture war leanings to the right
you can always tell
the beltway disease
Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and all patriotic Americans disagree with any suggestion that Roberts reached a defensible opinion.
Roberts rewrote a law supposedly passed by Congress to be a Constitutional tax rather than an unconstitutional fine, while allowing the government to argue that it was not a tax, and therefore Constitutional.
All of these acts are contrary to the Constitution and require such an act and arguments to be struck down.
It is what it is. Move on.
The end game is always the same - elect the right people politically - especially Congress. Elect fighters. Elect conservatives with a “get the gov’t out of my life slant”.
We are where we are today because we have a House and Senate filled with eunuchs.
SURELY, there must be some candidates with balls we can elect??
Mitt? No reason yet to think he ever owned a pair. I am not counting on him for much of anything.
I read a piece by Krauthammer which was in the very same vein, early this morning. I had an initial reaction very similar to the posts that I see here.
I was on a road trip and headed home. I climbed into the truck and chewed on what Mr. Krauthammer had said for the next five hours.
By the time I reached home, I came to the conclusion that Chief Justice Roberts had just done an incredibly brave thing. He fulfilled his duty as Chief Justice, he upheld the separation of powers, and the neutrality of the Supreme Court, despite how he is being slandered t the moment.
As nauseating as this horrible sh*t sandwich is, it was dully passed by both houses of Congress. It was signed by the President into law. Both of these actions were performed in conjunction with the Constitional authority granted to these respective, and separate, branches of our Federal Government.
Roberts decision was based on the fact that defining what is and what is not a sh*t sandwich was not a responsibility of the court, but was relegated to the ultimate authority in this country, we the voters. This is our responsibility to resolve.
It is now incumbent on us, the voters to petition our representatives to repeal this terrible piece of legislation. It is now our job to let them know that anything less than immediate action will result in their removal from office upon the very next election.
If our congress refuses to act, we must elect a new one. A new President, a new House and Senate. If we are too self-involved, lazy, or stupid to do this thing, we truly deserve the government we have.
I think that Chief Justice Roberts looks at the occasions where one branch of government steps outside the boundaries of their authority, and intrudes into territory where it has no business being. The decision of the Warren Court in Roe vs. Wade comes to mind, invalidating abortion law in 46 states in one fell swoop.
Roberts sold us out.
