It prevents me from gambling with the self-evident truths of the republic's founding, the stated purposes of the Constitution, and its explicit, imperative requirements, yes.
But betting on Romney wouldn't be a gamble, it would be a sure thing. We already know what he will do, because his record, and his words right up until the present, tell us that plainly. That is, if we're honestly listening.
Understanding your issues with Romney, you feel a continued Obama Presidency is a better bet for nascent life? Because without your support at the booth, that’s the gamble you’re making.
Is there no chance Romney would sign GOP restrictions on PP funding?
Conservative inaction benefits Obama, and makes things more difficult for the inevitable GOP Houses.
We need all 3 Houses.