Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss
It’s not written as a tax.
Then explain what I've got posted in reply 59.

How can it not be a tax when it says right there in the text that it's an excise tax?

61 posted on 06/30/2012 12:49:43 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

You are citing the wrong part of the Act.

The individual mandate everyone is arguing about and which Roberts ruled is a tax is in §5000A.

You cited what people call the “cadillac” tax in §49801, which is not the individual mandate but a different provision entirely.


66 posted on 06/30/2012 12:59:49 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36

But don’t feel bad, Congress didn’t understand the Act and they actually voted on it!


67 posted on 06/30/2012 1:03:43 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson