Probably for the same reason they didn't block Campaign Finance Reform--looking to the SC to block it. But they failed on that, too. The SC said although the Campaign Finance Reform Act DID abrogate freedom of speech, the evils of so much money in politics was the greater evil, so they woud allow a slight curtailing of free speech.
How can the SC iterpret the law, when they refuse to follow the Constitution. There is no such thing as a slight infringement on freedom of speech, just as there is no Constitutional way to allow for Obamacare.
vaudine
I am glad someone brought this up.. all you guys pinning hope on these idiots when we have seen proof that they will do what they say. I am thinking the best thing to do is participate in making the whole thing crash. give the dems everything they want, there wont be nothing left to support them in a few years.