[Meet the New Boss]

Merriam-Webster defines "compromise" as "a way of reaching agreement in which each person or group gives up something that was wanted in order to end an argument or dispute."

But Roberts convinced NOT A SINGLE LIBERAL JUSTICE that the Commerce Clause limits government power.

There was no compromise from the liberals. They took the gift from Roberts regarding the bizarre "tax" opinion upholding Obamacare, laughed and went on their way.

What Roberts did is called "capitulation."

Perhaps he "capitulated" because he was "compromised."

But that would be a different meaning of "compromise."

[True Republican Patriot]

First, Obama forced Roberts to come to the White House and reswear in Obama HUSSEIN without a Christian Bible! Very Unusual to say the Least!

Now, Obama started a Smear Campaign when he knew and was told SCOTUS had Voted against His Obamacare! Obama threatened Roberts, and Roberts cowered and reversed his decision after several months on the basis of some bizarre reasoning to say the Least!

Does America now have a Chief Justice who is being Blackmailed by the President? Looks pretty Scary!!

[Monorprise]

Well put.

[Monorprise]

Well put. It is possible that Traitor John was “Compromised” but he did not compromise with anyone.

[StAnDeliver]

"But Roberts convinced NOT A SINGLE LIBERAL JUSTICE that the Commerce Clause limits government power."

This is what I was thinking when Wallace interviewed Lew, and Lew insisted the 'majority' 'upheld' the Commerce Clause, and Wallace missed the opportunity:

• to point out that Lew was lamely referring to the 4 non-controlling majority opinion
• and then use that to stuff Lew by pointing out that Lew would be sitting there boohooing about Obamacare's rejection IF Roberts had not specifically written the controlling opinion which flatly states Bobocare is a TAX

There would be no way for Lew to walk that back.

Wallace could have further critized the absurdity of 1 Justice ruling over a 4-4 split (a well-defined 4-4 split that gave no cause, no rise whatsoever to the goofy outlier of Roberts creation made from whole cloth); and to compare Roberts to the detestable Warren/Burger Court era.