Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45

I don’t know why not. In 09 the tax on loose cigarette tobacco rose by 2300%.

As far as I’m concerned we should pass all the taxes imposed directly on to a consumer paid sales tax at the point of retail sale. After all, the consumer is already paying all the taxes imposed on the manufacturers anyway. Might as well let the consumer see the taxes they’re paying all the way down the line.


13 posted on 07/02/2012 11:54:22 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
I don’t know why not. In 09 the tax on loose cigarette tobacco rose by 2300%

You're correct - and don't forget, that is to fund health insurance for kids.

Since the ruling says the eds can impose a ta for not doing something, non-smokers, especially those who hailed that increased tax, should be required to pay a tax for NOT smoking. After all, it is for the children!

21 posted on 07/02/2012 12:14:39 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson