Replies

I think your questions re the Search result has to do with the method. A PI input the name and the State. It’s the same method I might use in Australia if I was ‘skip-tracing’ - looking for a debtor, for example.

The organization providing the service keeps certain records, from numerous sources, and when a name and region is entered, up pops what the system has collected on any individual who matches the input by the searcher.

As I tried to explain, it’s not always accurate, the results rely on the INPUT - and what that Search showed was simply that a person with THAT name has a certain birthdate, has a certain address, is married to a certain person, comes from a certain country and is of a certain ethnicity etc...AND OF COURSE THE OBVIOUS - a mortgage.

NOW THINK OF THE QUERY INPUT by the PI. Nothing more than a name and STATE.

And the result?

It’s obviously a combination of the data the system has collected on TWO PEOPLE. But why would the data of TWO people become blended on the the result of the input enquiry?

The searcher’s ONLY INPUT was the name and the State of the last known residence. RIGHT?

SO SOMETHING CAUSED THE AMALGAMATION. AND THAT COULD ONLY BE BECAUSE EITHER THE NAME OR THE BIRTHDATE WERE THE SAME.

But notice, David...the birthdate wasn’t part of the searchers input. That date came as the result of the Search. So, you have to ask, who was born on that date? If that date belongs to the person from Equatorial Guinea, then it was probably he who was born in January 1961.

And his name is what caused the amalgamation. And that would only happen if the man from Equatorial Guinea had the name of the Search Query. I’m sure you will be able to set this out better than I could, but after a number of years of using a similar service, it’s just plain elementary to me.

I would look at that result and conclude that the person I was looking for came from Equatorial Guinea, married Michelle and bought a house in IL. And his birthdate was probably January 8, 1961...because that would be the date on his passport at entry.

It would take me a while to realize there was a glitch - but eventually it would dawn...what you see relates to two people...who both had a record in the same name.

Here you discuss a birthdate in January 1961.
I had noted at the time a supposed misspeak by Obama in an address to the Summit of the Americas regarding the Bay of Pigs, to wit:
PORT OF SPAIN, TRINIDAD — "To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements," President Obama said to the Summit of the Americas this evening. "I’m very grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was 3 months old."
I marked this as significant. In my view it indicates how Obama is not integrated with his legend.
No one conflates one's birth with the Bay of Pigs, certainly no one who leads the nation which led that raid.
I posit January 1961 tracks better with the truth than the legend.
As an amplification of the character of those involved here, consider Testimony of Zoilamérica Narváez against her adoptive father Daniel Ortega Saavedra as the type of person to whom Obama is habitually compelled to apologize.