Well, I sometimes forward such material to other for reliable information, and if I had done so with the extensive information taken from this particular post of yours, my stamp on it would have proven me unreliable when I was depending on you. So, regretfully, it did matter.
However, having myself been mistaken a time or two, I double-checked its fidelity to the source, and found there that the list was stale. So I put the final note on it to warn others of the FR-timeline inaccuracy.
When I have been caught up in a key bit of mistaken detail, I have learned to be grateful for the correction, admit to all, and not push the wise counsel aside by making excuses. Boot camp stuff.
Not intending to harm or offend, just laying the inconsistencies away for good. This post still comes up in web searches. Perhaps it should be taken off.
Respectfully ---
I repeat.
Another thread not long afterward had roughly the same results.
So, old data or not, it was still in the ballpark. That’s not shoving anything aside. It’s telling you that the info is still dependable. Therefore, you can say to your friends, “this is how FR ranked X years ago, and it’s roughly the same today.”