[ThirstyMan]

So we're decrying the politics of obstruction are we Mr Axelrod? Don' forget who wrote the book on obstructionist opposition, Nancy and Harry. ‎"Why should we put a plan out? Our plan is to stop him. He must be stopped." March 17, 2005 -- Nancy Pelosi responding to a suggestion that she should work with George W. Bush and fix Social Security.

[betty boop]

So we're decrying the politics of obstruction are we Mr Axelrod? Don't forget who wrote the book on obstructionist opposition, Nancy and Harry. ‎"Why should we put a plan out? Our plan is to stop him. He must be stopped."

Don't blame Harry and Nancy for writing the handbook of "obstructionist opposition." They are merely students, devotees of it. And so are all of Obama's enablers and codependents.

They are all students of Saul Alinsky — a Left Progressive intellectual whose main specialty was the inversion of Reality, and the tactics required for "instantiating" such an inversion in the political realm.

Don't forget, Saul Alinsky dedicated his famous book, Rules for Radicals to Lucifer himself — as the very model for human "liberty."

In order to invert Reality, you have to spit on any idea of objective Truth. Thus, such inverters feel completely empowered to lie, cheat, and steal to get where they want to go — the construction of a "dream world" that has never worked anywhere, anytime, in all of human history — and totally falsifies human nature into the bargain.

With these people, the end always justifies the means.

The problem is, such means are not only anti-rational, but also anti-Liberty and anti-Life.

Can America build a future of liberty and prosperity on the basis of Lies?

Personally, I do not think that is possible.

Thanks so much for the ping, dear Thirsty Man!