Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
-- Remember that it was O'Mara who got Reckseidler to step aside, leaving George with one less disqualify the judge card. --

Reckseidler was disqualified on (d)(2) basis, conflict of interest. There is an unlimited number of these available to both sides in the dispute. Zimmerman used two, sort of by accident, as the court's next pick was a judge who knows O'Mara socially (O'Mara is godfather to the judge's son).

The motion to disqualify Lester is on a (d)(1) basis, the judge is prejudiced, biased, whatever you want to call it. Each side gets one of these "for free," and after that, subsequent (d)(1) disqualifications happen only if the judge agrees he is biased.

96 posted on 07/14/2012 12:34:49 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Each side gets one of these "for free

So then Lester's disqualification should be Zimmerman's slam dunk free one.,

97 posted on 07/14/2012 12:38:44 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson