[SERE_DOC]

So tell me Sparky, how does voting for a “whiter Shade of Fail” advance this country to a state where the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

And please show me where Massachusetts ranks in freedom, taxes, survivability for it's citizens.

I would rather follow Richard Pryor in Brewster's millions, and vote for “none of the above” and before you say I'm reelecting this POS in the White House, I don't buy that for a minute.

It's my vote, and I will vote for who I want, not because some troll (you) or any other clown says I'm throwing my vote away.

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

It’s my vote, and I will vote for who I want, not because some troll (you) or any other clown says I’m throwing my vote away.

---

I posted this on another thread...

Who would you rather have burn down your house, the arsonist in the blue shirt or the arsonist in the red shirt?

The arsonist in the red shirt will use less accelerant, so your house will burn slower. You could say he’s less of a threat.

Unfortunately, both choices result in your house burning down.

[Jeff Gordon]

“how does voting for a “whiter Shade of Fail” advance this country to a state where the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”

It avoids the possibility of Obama appointing SCOTUS Justices who will continue to castrate the constitution that you so dearly love (or do you?).