So you admit that this ‘sturdy’ is an inaccuracy used to tip the scales of reasoning but not reasonable in the final analysis? Got it. About what one expects in these discussions between polarized factions.
I’m not sure where our differences lie in the discussion. Do you find fault in my use of the word “sturdy”? Perhaps I should have used “conservative” instead. The point I was trying to make was that a solidly conservative House and Senate would go far towards severely restraining a second Obama term. Had we had that these last two years I think he would have gotten away with a lot less than he did.