Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

I prefer not to engage in fruitless Paulbot intellectual exercises that aren’t going to happen. Romney sucks, and it’s going to take a strong GOP majority congress to keep him in line (which means some of you need to get off your lazy whiny asses and help those candidates win), but the difference between Romney and Obama is stark.

It’s this simple: having to keep Romney’s liberal tendencies in check, versus a mental unstable megalomaniac who is attempting to unleash a fascist dictatorship the likes Hitler never dreamed up, one where night and day you are hunted by troops and drones, where most of your community is dead, and if you aren’t your scraping for a few bits of food and water while watching out for the ever present drones. Because I guarantee you Agenda 21 is going to be implemented on his watch.

Liberal tendencies v. Fascist Terminator Hell. Hmmm, easy choice to me.


45 posted on 07/17/2012 5:35:54 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Free Vulcan; P-Marlowe; cripplecreek; greyfoxx39; kabar; mkjessup; SoConPubbie; Yashcheritsiy; ...
It’s this simple: having to keep Romney’s liberal tendencies in check

Well, if the above line is what you really believe, then you should absolutely love this thread.

This thread reminds Mitt that he's rejected by conservatives, that his support is shallow or not at all, and that he'd better toe the line.

What is here for you to dislike?

I'd email a copy of it to his HQ just hold his feet to the fire.

Or are we talking about the kind of "hold mitt accountable" where no one ever says anything, where they meekly scrape and bow, and where they refuse to rock the boat no matter what kind of assinine comment or decision he makes?

I'm getting tired of the "we're going to keep him accountable" crowd that does nothing but spin, spin, spin when he makes a mistake.

That "hold him accountable" crowd let his gay couple/gay adoption annoucement glide by without starting a raging storm against him. Is that what is meant by "hold accountable?"

59 posted on 07/17/2012 5:47:57 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Free Vulcan

Romney doesn’t have liberal tendencies, he is a liberal. He governed that way his whole political life.
Romney does not tend towards liberalism, he embraces it.
Do you honestly beleive with the Republican leadership we in the house and none in the senate Romney’s feet would be held to the fire?
Romney despises conservatives, do you really think he will (even if both houses were conservative) work with them, or will he do what he always has done and work with liberal democrats.
I think people who beleive Romney would somehow be different than he has been before, just because some conservatives caved from fear or hysteria are well.......wrong.


70 posted on 07/17/2012 6:00:13 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Free Vulcan
The stark differences between Romney and Obama are readily reduced to two things ~ 10 years difference in age, and one of them has more gray hair.

Otherwise, they're both pretty much the same thing even down to the way they pick economic winners

71 posted on 07/17/2012 6:04:13 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson