Zullo - the microfilm would show if the document O showed is the same as on the microfilm and he bets it shows something different.
Ok, that’s fine but that doesn’t mean that the info on the microfilm has or hasn’t also been manipulated. The microfilm is a secondary source. They need to actual certificate held in the health department that came from the hospital... if it exists.
Hmm, not only was there nothing on the ID of the forger but there was nothing about Virginia’s BC.
The End.
What do you wanna bet that the roll of microfilm is missing.
Stuff like this makes me wonder why there was lots of press coverage yrs ago when Obama spent time in Utah visiting with the Latter Day Saints. You know they maintain a kajillion boxes of microfilm in their vault. Wonder if he would have tried accessing & tampering with stuff they have on him.
The microfilm is less subject to manipulation because it represents the documents that were held at the time. It is done chronologically and sequentially. Hard to go back and insert something afterwards. The so called orginals can be manipulated, added or deleted.
Ms Fukino who saw the documents said they were half hand written. It sounds like there were lots of changes and affadavits. The composite produced by the WH is a compilation of information in electronic format. Someone other than Hawaii created it.