Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dosa26

As a juror, I would truthfully answer any questions, as I have done on all the juries I have been called for. In the VERY unlikely event that I was then seated, I would view the evidence impartially. At that point, if the facts presented match the article that I have read, I would find her “not guilty” and laugh in the judge’s face. Unfortunately, contempt is (usually or always?) decided by the judge, not a jury. She’s at the mercy of the woman who already showed no concern for her as a victim. I just hope the judge is reading our comments - and has as little backbone as John Roberts.


56 posted on 07/21/2012 8:08:13 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


http://twitter.com/savymarie_

“@savymarie_’s account is protected.

Only confirmed followers have access to @savymarie_’s Tweets and complete profile. Click the “Follow” button to send a follow request.”

Curiouser and...


60 posted on 07/21/2012 8:15:04 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1

IF I get called I don’t know how to tie my shoes. How do you get out of contempt? 1. judge taken care of. 2. ass kissing.. I dont know nor care


66 posted on 07/21/2012 8:29:08 PM PDT by Dosa26 (JURY NULLIFICATION! IT'S THE LAW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson