Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aleya2Fairlie

Lots of differences.

I’m reminded of a legal argument about pornography, in which someone drew a simple stick figure, with a line for a body, four more lines for arms and legs, and a circle for a head.

As such, quite legal. But then, if you say that the same stick figure is of an underage girl who is naked, it is technically illegal, because it is a “depiction” of a child.

In the case of a violent video game, depictions of murder are just that. Nobody and nothing is murdered, just electrons are rearranged in different patterns on a computer screen, maybe with sound effects.

Take the old computer game of Pac-Man. Would it become violent and grotesque if someone describes the dots the Pac-Man was eating as “babies”, and the “ghosts” as “rapists”?

While a connection has been drawn between a psychopath or sociopath harming real animals when they are young, there has never been any serious evidence that EC comic books, rock and roll music, Warner Brothers cartoons, or video games have any ability to make someone dangerous who was not originally dangerous.


35 posted on 07/23/2012 5:33:51 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

I would have tended to agree with you a decade or so ago. However, the desensitization of society to all manner of violence and perversion seems to have taken its toll on our country and our youth.I’m wondering how far it will go.

The appetite for such fare always demands more and better ( or in this case, worse.


37 posted on 07/24/2012 4:32:11 PM PDT by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson