Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman
100 meters in 58 seconds after having just swum 300 meters? A 16-year-old girl?

Holy cow.

11 posted on 07/31/2012 1:08:32 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Finny
As a former competitive swimmer myself, I can tell you that beating your former best time in a 100m race by 5 seconds is a huge flag that something is wrong.

No-one makes gains like that except the people who are just starting out swimming. Once you've been training and swimming for a couple of years, you've pretty well gotten close to the edge of your nominal performance envelope. Your speed is fairly well determined by your build, muscle tone, and technique - did you get a good start, did your strokes work out well for the turn and finish (ie. no coasting or short strokes). In any one race these things add up to a tenth of a second (plus or minus) here or there. As you grow/mature and add muscle, you tend to get a little faster year-to-year.

Throughout the course of a season a good swimmer might pull their time in a 100m event down a second, maybe a little more. If they are really pumped up at a big event, or playing catch-up on the last leg of a relay (eg. the French team) they may shave a few tenths, even a whole second off a personal best.

Taking 5 seconds off is a red flag. That's a local Girl Scout troop beating a Marine recon company at arm wrestling. Something is wrong, very, very wrong.

53 posted on 07/31/2012 5:43:48 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson