Posted on 08/02/2012 12:34:07 PM PDT by oliverdarcy
The lady handled the situation really well. He was obviously trying to provoke her and he abused his position as a customer to bully this woman. No doubt, he was desperating trying to get this lady to do something stupid.
The employee can make money off this and shut this professor up at the same time, by suing him for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The video is all the evidence the employee needs.
Any Freeper lawyers out there? This one is just money hanging on a tree as far as I can tell.
Oh yeah, that is going to be the talk of the boardroom today.
twitter address for the chick fil a that Adam terrorized with verbal abuse
@cfaelcontucson
I think loss of job as CFO for conduct reasons will be punishment enough...
If any business supporting anti gay positions should be boycotted, why is the prof driving a car burning gasoline whose profits go to Arab Gulf nations that KILL HOMOSEXUALS. If Chick a Fil must leave campus, then all Islamic centers funded by HOMOSEXUAL KILLING Arab Gulf nations better vacate also.
He’s been brainwashed by academia and the leftist.
He swallowed ten gallons of their swill, which has reduced him to a whining cry baby who hates everyone who doesn’t happen to agree with him.
A CFO who's personal finances are a shambles as well. See post #3 upthread. This guy is some real bright bulb. NOT!
Adjunct. He teaches one class now and then. In other words, a part-time nobody. Pathetic leftist looking for 15 minutes.
The ‘college moron’ (professor) should have some people go to his classroom and debase him in front of his class. I wonder if that dumbass would act like the young lady.
Ah, the “hypocrisy” that isn’t...
They support homos, because homos are a weapon against Christianity.
They support Muslims for the same reason.
So he’s much like the pResident..
a professor in name only.
Thanks Rummy, I got to say, all those kids who work at Chick-Fil-A are darn nice kids.
I love it.
Just loaded for me. try again.
I gave um a tip... Fire him. Not for the gay issues. but because he is abusive to women and not the type of person you want representing the company.
Such a pitiful little bully. OK, just wondering here: he drove there on roads somebody else built and drove in a car somebody else built, so how can he claim he did anything? He didn’t make that happen! Somebody else did that. Such a slf-aggrandizing little twit.
Would that be in the Sandusky tradition?
“without a gay in me “ Does that mean some have a gay in them going through the drive thru?
What is the name of the company and what is their contact info?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.