Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chick-fil-A Leaps Into Controversy
The Wall Street Journal ^ | August 2, 2012

Posted on 08/02/2012 7:29:29 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

Edited on 08/02/2012 8:11:00 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

After all the shouting, tweeting and protesting is over, the fried-chicken empire of Chick-fil-A will be just fine. Sales at the company, which recently leapt into the debate over gay marriage, may even get a lift in the near term.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: chickfila; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2012 7:29:34 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“a business that has misjudged its bigger audience. “

Pray tell who, exactly, is this “bigger audience”?


2 posted on 08/02/2012 7:36:05 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1290 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It isn't often that a company chief tells the public it is "arrogant" and "inviting God's judgment" for supporting something controversial, such as gay marriage.

The "public" has voted down gay "marriage" every single time it's been put to a vote.

The scoreboard is something like 37-zip.

Since the author of this piece, John Bussey, writes from Washington DC, he thinks that's "controversial."

3 posted on 08/02/2012 7:36:56 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Beats me. I thought they where judging their audience just fine.

The 1%er’s (the gay/lesbo/libs) that won’t eat there probably wouldn’t have before the flap anyways.


4 posted on 08/02/2012 7:38:38 PM PDT by cableguymn (For the first time in my life. I fear my country's government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Written by a moron.


5 posted on 08/02/2012 7:41:04 PM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Chick will see a large surge in consumers in the short term, and a small surge in the long term. There is a large enough percentage of people who’ve never been to a Chick-Fil-A who will patronize them from here on to overshadow the loss of consumers engaged in a permanent boycott. It’s a win/win for Chick.


6 posted on 08/02/2012 7:41:33 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Friend told me today, she went there and tried to eat. The wait in line was an hour and a half. The parking lot was full, they had cops directing traffic. And this was in Indiana.


7 posted on 08/02/2012 7:44:30 PM PDT by Battle Axe (Repent, for the coming of the Lord is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I had never heard of this franchise. If I ever encounter one in my travels though, I will immediately stop and buy a chicken sandwich with waffle fries.


8 posted on 08/02/2012 7:46:10 PM PDT by Rio (Tempis fugit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Chick-fil-A, at a minimum, is a business that has misjudged its bigger audience.

Dream on. Chic Fil A appealed to the majority. This issue is a financial gold mine!

Gee, does anyone think the homosexual kiss in ( which will gross out any normal person who may wonder in and make them a new Chic Fil A traditional marriage supporter) is going to be anywhere near as massive?

The freaks will assemble, and the normal people will be laughing their butts off at the kinky freak show. It'll be like the Jerry Springer show - Live. Every kind of weirdo will be there.

The homos think people go to see their parades to support them. They have no idea people go because the freak show is free. Circuses used to make people pay for that stuff.

9 posted on 08/02/2012 7:48:17 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Since the author of this piece, John Bussey, writes from Washington DC, he thinks that's "controversial."

The attitude reminds me of the first fried chicken tycoon, Colonel Sanders.

After his chain hit 600 units (huge at the time), he was featured on "What's My Line?", set in NYC with all NYC panelists (e.g. Arlene Frances).

They got to look at what must be today the 4th or 5th most recognizeable man in the United Sattes today, and they didn't have a clue. They asked questions like "Are you involved in the legitimate theatre?" Their world ends at the boundary with the Bronx.

Little has changed. L.A. doesn't need NFL football, and good chicken joints don't need big eastern cities.
10 posted on 08/02/2012 7:48:35 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Can I make an observation, about this article in particular and media coverage in general?

Chick Fill A did not leap into the gay marriage controversy. They did not seek this out. Their owners are devout Christians. One of those owners gave an interview with a Baptist magazine. Somehow this interview made its way into the MSM, where the liberals went into their outrage routine. The owners did not launch a campaign against same-sex marriage.

The point is, the liberals picked this fight with Chick Fill A. Don’t you see what is happening? The liberals decided to pick this fight, to damage this company, and to teach a lesson to others, as to what would happen to them if they get on the wrong side of the liberal homosexual mafia.


11 posted on 08/02/2012 7:53:31 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Over at the dumpster they are all echoing each other that in the long run, they will lose out.

Conveniently glossing over the fact that homo marriage has been defeated everywhere it has come up for a vote.

They got the orders to climb Mount Nikita and now, like Yamamoto supposedly said, “they have awoken a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve.”

Having homo marriage become part of the rat platform is just gravy.


12 posted on 08/02/2012 7:57:28 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It isn't often that a company chief tells the public

He wasn't telling the 'public', he was being interviewed by a Baptist newspaper.

A member of the gaystopo saw it, and now they won't rest until the man is prosecuted for his personal beliefs.

It's just the way they are.

13 posted on 08/02/2012 7:58:21 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I’d take the WSJ seriously if they would have been right about anything in the last ten years. Seems they are little more than NY Times knockoff.


14 posted on 08/02/2012 8:03:51 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Skittle pooping unicorns are more common than progressives with honor & integrity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Dilbert San Diego
The liberals decided to pick this fight, to damage this company, and to teach a lesson to others, as to what would happen to them if they get on the wrong side of the liberal homosexual mafia.

And Chic Fil A was well rewarded for speaking up. Their honesty was nothing short of blessed.

This should embolden any company that wants to side with the majority. It's one of the best advertising campaigns "never created" by a companies PR department.

16 posted on 08/02/2012 8:04:09 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It is strange that this article neglects to mention when this controversy caught fire. That was when the mayors of Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York criticized Chick-Fil-A and some stated that they would be prohibited from opening in their cities. That reeks of governmental prohibition of free speech and (dare I say it) fascism. Sure they tried to backtrack on their statements (probably when the cities' lawyers mentioned potential liability on 14th amendment equal protection violations), but by then it was way too late.

Also, Rahm, everyone knows that Chicago values refers to city officials demanding bribes to do their jobs and gunfights in the streets like some third-world city.

17 posted on 08/02/2012 8:05:43 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Recycled Olympic tagline Shut up, Bob Costas. Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“For the average consumer, let alone the average Chick-fil-A consumer, this kind of thing goes right over their heads.”

Guess he didn’t see the pictures of how heavily patronized CFA was all across the country. What a clueless and condescending comment. Compare contrast- CFA/ JCPenny stock drop.


18 posted on 08/02/2012 8:06:40 PM PDT by pops88 (Standing with Breitbart for truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

What color is the sky on this guy’s planet? He must have missed yesterday’s big show of support, which, along with everything else, probably brought in new customers who hadn’t tried it before and just did so to show support for the 1st Ad or the owner’s principles, and may come back in the future. It’s hard to buy advertising this good.


19 posted on 08/02/2012 8:06:47 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It isn't often that a company chief tells the public it is "arrogant"...

Yeah, that is usually leftist, suck up to the intellectual elite, lame stream newspapers with "the customer is always wrong" attitude, and cratering circulation numbers, that do this.

20 posted on 08/02/2012 8:12:20 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson