Sorry for the double-post, everybody.
I would just add this to what I said: It was no accident that the date range heading was left off the “birth index” that the HDOH hands out to the public when they ask for the 1960-64 birth index. All the other indices have a date range heading. The protocol for printing those reports had to be specifically altered in order to get that result. There was a reason for that: to give them the option of saying they never claimed that was the 1960-64 birth index.
When I posted a comment here about that birth index before any images of that index had been posted anywhere, a poster antagonistic to the “birther” issue immediately said they presumed the birth index page I was talking about had a date range listed on it so that I could prove that the document was claiming to be the 1960-64 birth index...
A very revealing comment. It wasn’t lost on me. It revealed the fudge room that the HDOH built into that document. Which says to me that this was deliberate deception on their part. They knew they would be in a heap of legal trouble if it could be proven they claimed that was the real 1960-64 birth index.
It also suggested to me that I was speaking with somebody who was NOT just a casual observer but was aware that the HDOH omitted the date range heading and that the HDOH would use that for legal CYA.
Sound like that person was giving you a heads up to what they were trying to do.
Allow with what BDZ has found and well reported without waiver. There is a very decernable and documentable pattern of corruption that is not hard to track.
Does anyone have the ‘Peterboy’ COLB. It was a COLB for Peter J Kema Jr., aka, Peterboy. His 1991 COLB used to be publicly available at the Hawaii DOH website. Why? He was deceased and the newspapers sued to gain access to all of his records held by Hawaii. This included his COLB pinted in 1991.
The COLB from 1991 is tell just in its format. It is similar in content to newer ones. But it included much, much more elaborate security and anti-copy features. The copy posted at HDOH had the word VOID all over it from the photocopy process - just as any standard photocopy document should have.
Two elements show long term and shorter term corruption by Hawaii.
First, the later COLB or LFBCs documents are all but void any security features. The 1991 Peterboy document has many more features to resist tampering than a current document.
Second, HDOH removed access to Peterboy’s COLB from their website in 2009 or 2010. Even though it had been there FOR YEARS without issue. It is a public document. But it showed that Hawaii explicitly and deliberately weakened the anti-tampering features of their official documents. So easy access to the document from their own website was removed.
Hawaii is home to severe corruption. It was going on well before 2008. But it has become much more bolder over the last 4 years.