Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billionaire Palm Beach Democrat Jeff Greene Fears Revolt of the Poor
http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/ ^

Posted on 08/06/2012 8:34:08 AM PDT by jakerobins

Billionaire Jeff Greene is a different kind of rich Democrat.

The man who made his fortune hedging against the real estate market -- and since 2009 accumulating mortgage-backed securities -- still wants to represent the poor, improve their lot, convince his rich friends they should pay more taxes.

But is his political ideology built on compassion? On a sense of social justice and social order?

Not exactly, says Joel Endelman, "Jeff is definitely not about compassion."

(Excerpt) Read more at sunshinestatenews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2012; billionaires; corruption; democrats; fearfuldems; fraud
Hey Jeff maybe you should take a long hard look at supporting a party that espouses Class Warfare and supports groups like Occupy Wall Street.
1 posted on 08/06/2012 8:34:12 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Jeff should save himself by giving every last dime to the poor.


2 posted on 08/06/2012 8:38:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

The peasants are revolting! Yeah, they stink on ice!.........

3 posted on 08/06/2012 8:40:55 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

No way. This Dimocrat should fear the wrath of the people against the government. He should fear economic collapse in which case, we will have anarachy, repression and civil war. That’s no good for the poor, middle class or the rich.


4 posted on 08/06/2012 8:41:27 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

There’s a little section on the tax return form where a filer can send an additional amount of money to the IRS. I find it rather funny that these so called ‘generous rich people’ seem rather reluctant to ‘set an example’ and use that section. It’s also rather ironic that study after study over the years have shown that rich liberals are some of the cheapest people you will meet and least likely to donate money to charitable causes.


5 posted on 08/06/2012 8:41:50 AM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

IIRC, this is the guy who ran in 2010 for the Dem nod for the Senate. He lost to the genius Kendrick Meek who lost big to Rubio.


6 posted on 08/06/2012 8:49:20 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

IIRC, this is the guy who ran in 2010 for the Dem nod for the Senate. He lost to the genius Kendrick Meek who lost big to Rubio.


7 posted on 08/06/2012 8:50:26 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins
I got news for Mr. Greene: paying more in taxes won't help stave off a revolt. Providing real opportunities for people is what everyone really wants, and taxes are not the answer (well, lower and fewer taxes are part of it...).

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

8 posted on 08/06/2012 8:50:54 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

It is not inequality of wealth that leads people to revolt. Revolt occurs when those who have less come to believe that they have no opportunity to better themselves socioeconomically. America has done just fine, without class embitterment for most of its history - because it has been envisioned by most as the ‘land of opportunity’.

In short, it is class mobility that is essential to keep a system like our viable. Now we have large swaths of the population who don’t believe that they truly have the ability to move upward socioeconomically. They’ve been conditioned to think that they do not really have the opportunity or the ability to be upwardly mobile. This loss of the hope and belief that one can become better off on the basis of their own efforts is a dangerous step in the path toward socialism.

Europe was ripe for socialism because it was very hierarchical with no real opportunity for upward mobility. It remains very hierarchical, without much real opportunity for upward mobility, except they now use socialism as a way to keep resentment in check. This appears to be the model that Jeff Greene is espousing.


9 posted on 08/06/2012 9:06:09 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Fear of a French revolution is why a lot of wealthy people support socialists. Which is odd because socialists mine hate the rich envy for power.

Globalism made his billions possible and Globalism, combined with Clinton and Rubin cooking up a plan to use banks to fund housing for low income people, has just about dissolved the middle class in America.

Government corruption, the cultural cleansing program of multi-culturalism and illegal immigration has misplaced Americans in thier own homeland and dissolved our Western and constitutional culture which was this idiot’s real insurance against a meltdown by the barbarians.

The government taking this man’s 2 billion is not going to solve the economic and social problems going on in America. Feeding the power of envy and big government is last thing fearful billionaires should be doing.


10 posted on 08/06/2012 9:09:30 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Forget party; forget taxes. Why don’t these rich dorks just donate 20% each of their worth to a big money pot, and personally distribute it to the poor, completely bypassing any government agency, which would only eat most of the money?

Because they’re not serious about paying taxes themselves. Any doubts about this will be removed by a quick look at the fleet of accountants and tax attorneys they pay.


11 posted on 08/06/2012 9:13:40 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Providing real opportunities for people is what everyone really wants,...

No, there really are people out there who believe to the very marrow of their bones that because their ten-generations-back ancestors were captured and sold into bondage by the next tribe up the river that they, and their children into perpetuity, are owed free goodies for life.

12 posted on 08/06/2012 9:15:25 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Revolt of the poor? Give us a break already. Section 8, housing, free health care, food stamps, welfare, automobiles, ac, education, no taxes and on and on. Yup the pooor really have it rough in the old USA.


13 posted on 08/06/2012 9:29:45 AM PDT by kenmcg (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins
"if you have 50,000 angry people coming across the river, you think you're safe?"

democracy is necessary as the means of making possible peaceful changes in government, so that a dissatisfied majority would not have to resort to revolution or civil war to have its way.

14 posted on 08/06/2012 9:41:40 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp

“if you have 50,000 angry people coming across the river, you think you’re safe?”

Those 50,000 are too lazy to get a job or make a business. They won’t be coming across any rivers, much less half a mile down the road.


15 posted on 08/07/2012 7:17:50 AM PDT by CodeToad (History says our end is near.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
If I ever become a rich dork, I will make sure Uncle Sugar takes as little of MY money as I possibly can.

Taxes are a serious and punative thing. One does not ever “donate” extra to any entity that has the power to tax.
Ask the French.
They just elected a government that passed a 75% tax rate on their “rich dorks”.
Next year, France will be bemoaning the lack of rich dorks who speak French.

16 posted on 08/09/2012 5:53:38 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

I couldn’t agree more. And I suspect the rich dorks I cited also agree with you. And, given that, I find it contemptible that they suggest raising taxes on everyone else so that they can score compassion points, when they really don’t deserve them. It’s only the loud mouthed ones I target as phonies.

BTW, I didn’t suggest they donate 20% to the government; only to a big community pot, then distribute it directly, bypassing government and other institutions that eat up the money in the form of “administrative expenses.” In the end, it’s personal acts of charity that are far more successful at addressing poverty than any program any government could ever conceive.


17 posted on 08/11/2012 6:12:39 PM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson