Wrong. Look at the course you're plotting to avoid lethal shoals altogether, because if you get in them, navigating them "one crisis at a time" with a liberal behind the wheel is guaranteed to have bad results.
You want to get "the black communist" out of office because you are so certain that a Repubican congress, even if Obama only won on a plurlaity (very likely the best he could do, reading the tea leaves), wouldn't have the courage to fight him -- yet you think that same Congress would defy the defacto leader of their own party who won with a solid popular mandate majority?
Wishful thinking, anyone?
Romney sure as heck didn't do much for the economy of Massachusetts. Really, there's so much wishful thinking that must be engaged in anticipating Romney. Obama is a weak fraud -- but you are so terrified of his imaginary power that you refuse point blank to consider means to make him vulnerable and take advantage of it. Instead, you advocate voting to make liberalism more powerful in the Republican party. It is quite, quite that simple: that is what you are proposing to do, and then wishing, wishing, wishing that the liberal you elect will not act like the liberal you KNOW him to be.
Because you cannot handle the REAL risks of Romney winning on a landslide and the REAL sense of at least voting for a plurality to prevent a mandate of either liberal, you are reduced to accusing me of sophistry, ironic because you then accuse me of doing "Obama's bidding." YOU are doing liberalism's bidding. FACE IT. And then face that crisis FIRST.
They will lie right down, like they are doing now.
If Romney wants a second term he will have to deal with the conservative base.
You're not persuasive and you're not even paying attention. Obama is circumventing Congress and the longer he stays in office the longer our economic disaster continues. Plus, if he survives this election, there will be nothing to stop him from an all-out assault on the Constitution and the free market economy.
Would Romney, in his wildest dreams, do that to America? I don't believe it.
If anyone is weak, it's Romney. He's not a forceful leader. A Republican Congress will have more sway with him because he doesn't think about ways to get around Congress. He's a go-along-get-along milquetoast moderate. He was a liberal Zelig in Democrat-controlled Massachussetts and he's campaigning now as somebody far more conservative than that.
We don't really know the real Romney but whoever he is cannot possibly do more damage to America than a second term of Obama where he is beholden to nobody and has no need to reign himself in just to get re-elected.
NO SANE AMERICAN WANTS TO GO ANYWHERE NEAR A SECOND OBAMA TERM and that's why the sane conservatives are going to bite their tongues, hold their noses and vote for Romney despite all they mistrust about him.
That you refuse tells me all I need to know about you.