ad hominem??? Is that what you're trying to convey???
LOL, look up the word, maybe you'll learn to spell it at the same time you might even learn, maybe even comprehend, the definition.
Who do you prefer in the White House, a muzzie or a Mormon?
You have a choice, pick one.
You call your so-called "options" a "choice"???
(If Obama loses in '12; re-runs as an (R) in 2020 vs. a more liberal Dem...no, I don't buy your argument that I am FORCED to vote for Obama come 2020...)
You, see...we have more "choices" than what your utilitarian pragmatic political relativistic ethics dictate to you...
You are told, automaton-like, "YOU HAVE TO VOTE for evil."
And we are telling this -- and future generations -- "No. You are not in bondage and locked in as lackeys to having counterfeit conservatives -- RINOs -- dictate you to you how you will vote."
Lurkers: The above is what relativism delivers. The above is what utilitarianism delivers. The above is what pragmatism delivers.
Think Neville Chamberlain...and you know who the "hero" is of these compromising philosophies...
LVR dislays the false excluded middle again...