Posted on 08/10/2012 11:38:05 PM PDT by grundle
Then vote for Obama and save us oh Liberty Caucus.
You can ram it in your pie hole and blow it out your ears.
Before anyone votes, they must have information about the candidates.
Ryan is perfect for Romeny. Neither gives a damn about our God-given liberties.
Is this some wacka nut Ron Paul group?
LOL
Ryan is one of the most substantive conservatives in the House and kicked Obama’s ass in that stupid ObamaCare charade that was on TV.
You people are turning into nutters and you’d call Reagan a RINO.
Ok, sure.
More drama queen fun on late night FR.
All I know is what Romney / Ryan MIGHT do in four years compared to what Obama WILL do if he goes back in.
I’ll take my chances with R & R.
Ron Paul on the Board....
F’n Bullshit.
Oh, it was a negative to vote for authorization of force for Iraq...despite all of the Intel that Bush had pointing to this being a proper decision.
Liberaltarian BS.
What you said...
No. It details Ryan’s votes and stances from a Liberaltarian perspective...
As long as everybody understands that Ron Paul is on the board and influencing the VoteIndex with his anti American, blame America first nutter Foreign Policy.
So, if you don’t want that light shining on the group, put your maxi pads on on the way out.
Ryan on his votes for Tarp, Auto and AIG:
Call me annoying, but he did sign FOPA into law, with the Hughes Amendment still attached.
The paulbots are already melting down all over the place.
Was your first sentence really necessary? Although you are wrong, at least the rest of your comment was intelligent. Enough of the drama queen act...
Was your first sentence really necessary? Although you are wrong, at least the rest of your comment was intelligent. Enough of the drama queen act...
Yes, Russ. The first sentence was in the same spirit as the insulting boob I responded to on this issue.
Ryan is no more a conservative than Romney. The VP candidate should be a very, very conservative person not presently holding political office.
Either Sarah Palin or Newt Gingrich would have been perfect. All this demonstrates is Romney’s tin ear for politics AND the fact he doesn’t like strong women.
Do you know that Romney is a self-avowed Progressive, a national socialist? In German, that’s Nazi. And no, I didn’t make it up. You can google it.
That’s Ryan’s reputation, but it doesn’t actually match with his record. He’s very much a go-along, liberty-compromising, big government pol.
That said, IMO he’s the best of the options Romney was considering—TPaw? Portman? Amnesty Rubio? Rockefeller Petraeus?
So, I’m neither excited nor exercised over the pick.
You are so right. I'm with you and obama/biden.
You purists are looking for Mr. Goodbar, and he doesn't exist.
Ronald Reagan was far from perfect, he was the head of a union and was a demonRAT.
While I think Ryan is a fine pick, it doesn’t matter because the nominee is still Mitt Romney. I’m just amazed that the GOP thinks they can use the same tactic that failed the last time with a candidate that makes John McCain look good.
Mittley will get a bump but it won’t be anything like the Palin effect.
Sounds like Paul Ryan is the exact opposite of Cut and Run. Ryan a strong conservative who wants to keep America safe and strong. Sounds like a good pick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.