Posted on 08/13/2012 3:29:17 PM PDT by Hunton Peck
Last year, there was a case where a private pool had to close down because they refused to allow an inner city group to bring kids to it, and they would not change their policy, so they closed. (I don’t think it was a inner city church group, but I do think the distinction is important)
They HAD allowed those same inner city groups to rent the facilities, but they were so disruptive and destructive they vowed not to allow them in again.
So they were sued. And they closed up instead.
I don’t remember where it was, but I did read the news article on it.
This is different, apparently, and doesn’t look like it was this kind of thing. But I will admit that when I hear about interactions that businesses have with inner city youths, the context is important.
I thought the same thing, but then I read the threat by the pesky lawyer who told him be had better not give any covert discount. I bet this prick has a private dick following this guy around, hoping to catch him making donations and file a billion dollar discrimination suit and sic the DOJ on him.
Militant atheists are undoubtedly the most miserable, obnoxious and annoying people there are on this earth. If they they are unhappy here, just wait until the go to the next place.
You left out the part where the advocacy group threatened legal action ,meaning the government, which is why he acquiesced. The government will call his park a “public accommodation” and punish him if he doesn’t get right with the secularists. In a free country such a threat would not exist and people could frequent or not frequent his park based on his discount policies.
According to this article, at least, the “advocacy group” (read: thuggish lawyers) caught wind of this after the water park changed its policy, and threatened legal action if the water park reinstitutes the discount. Obviously that’s a problem, but that does not appear to have been a factor in the initial decision.
You have no conscience. :-} Why else would the owner change existing policy? One reason and one reason only, the threat of government hanging over his exposed neck.
There’s some pretty clear rules here, and it is not particularly hard to operate legally if you follow them.
As far as the church groups go, that is probably the trickiest one. You can’t offer a discount for a church group *as such* without getting hassled; so you have to restructure the offer, perhaps as a coupon in an “advertisement annex” to a church bulletin. Creativity is a must to get away with this.
The deal about giving a discount for bringing in a church bulletin is not discriminatory, and the scoundrel’s statement that “I did this not out of spite”, is a bald faced lie.
It’s their business! They have a right to do what they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.