Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
"Similarly, the proper application of the state secrets privilege may unfortunately mean the sacrifice of individual liberties for the sake of national security."

That's an Orwellian statement. I understand about Muslims, though, and think their pseudo-religion is really a political cult, which is plotting against us, but the nature of the statement makes me wonder what is the point of liberty if it can be so easily sacrificed? In other words, who gets to decide when government gets to invoke "the sake of national security"?

7 posted on 08/16/2012 4:27:50 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!
I understand about Muslims, though, and think their pseudo-religion is really a political cult, which is plotting against us, but the nature of the statement makes me wonder what is the point of liberty if it can be so easily sacrificed? In other words, who gets to decide when government gets to invoke "the sake of national security"?

Indeed. "National security" is not the root passphrase to the U.S. Constitution. The burden on the government should be fairly high if they want to keep something secret. That's not the way a police state works though.

9 posted on 08/16/2012 6:42:32 AM PDT by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson