[Blood of Tyrants]

Well, either Romney or Obama will be our next president. Choose your poison.

[Godwin1]

They can say what they want: no responsible parent will permit his/her young boy to stay in the company of a homosexual scout leader. If homosexuality is forced on the Scouts by an ALL POWERFUL STATE, the Scouts are finished. As an independent institution that fosters love of God, Country and our way of life, I can understand why Obama and the the modern democrat party want to destroy the Scouts. But why would Romney want to do so?

[Finny]

Well, either Romney or Obama will be our next president. Choose your poison.

Or choose to weaken whichever poison wins. You can do that, too, though in doing, you forfeit any say in whether Obama or Romney gets the White House. For me, it's like forfeting any say in whether I get Coke or Pepsi in a restaurant.

The one thing you cannot do is vote "against" either one of them -- voting "against" is imaginary, a sophistry. You can only vote FOR in elections. I'll be voting FOR giving the next liberal president a plurality. Those who vote for Romney will, like those who vote for Obama, be voting FOR making liberalism stronger. On the other hand, my third-party vote will be FOR denying a mandate to whichever liberal wins. My vote will be FOR making liberalism weaker.