Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/19/2012 4:53:20 PM PDT by DaveinOK54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: DaveinOK54

They are reading the Tea leaves and don ‘t want to be on the losing side...


2 posted on 08/19/2012 4:55:30 PM PDT by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54
Let's destroy the enemy. How about they don't succeed and then there is no need for a message?

3 posted on 08/19/2012 4:57:24 PM PDT by I see my hands (It's time to.. KICK OUT THE JAMS, MOTHER FREEPERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

I have no idea what you’re talking about, but don’t be fooled. Those assclowns at Newsweak and every other Democrat “mainstream” newsroom will do everything in their power to get their communist p.o.s. re-elected.


6 posted on 08/19/2012 4:58:49 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54
"Let's reward good behavior. Newsweek is apparently desperate to survive. We plan on buying this issue off the shelf. Might they get the message????"

That would be a huge mistake.

7 posted on 08/19/2012 5:04:44 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

I haven’t read the article, but I believe they start out with “Obama has not kept his promises’, or some such.

Not good to start out with a lie.

Obama HAS kept his promises, that’s why we’re in such trouble.

Remember how he promised to ‘fundamentally change how America works’?

Better they go broke.


9 posted on 08/19/2012 5:05:32 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54
Nope!
10 posted on 08/19/2012 5:05:32 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Then again, it might be handy to give the election to the pubbies and let the economy collapse on their watch. Then, enter Hillary, stage left in 2016.


14 posted on 08/19/2012 5:25:38 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Newsweek is a piece of shit.


15 posted on 08/19/2012 5:29:52 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

No. Let them die. Why? No.


17 posted on 08/19/2012 5:35:14 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

I’ll buy one just to encourage them to publish more stories like it.


19 posted on 08/19/2012 5:37:23 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

I’m sorry, but.... I’m missing something here. Is there a link to this article. I’m totally in the dark here.


20 posted on 08/19/2012 5:38:51 PM PDT by pistolpackinpapa (Why is it that you never see any Obama bumper stickers on cars going to work in the mornings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54; All

I did a Google Search to see the cover and read the story. DAMN.... this can’t help Prez dude. I’m shocked that Newsweek is even running the story much less making it a “Cover” story. UNBELIEVABLE!!!


21 posted on 08/19/2012 5:44:44 PM PDT by pistolpackinpapa (Why is it that you never see any Obama bumper stickers on cars going to work in the mornings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Maybe I’ll read the article in 4-5 years in the doctor’s waiting room.

I will give them no money, they won’t change in gratitude to us and have only done harm for years.


22 posted on 08/19/2012 5:45:54 PM PDT by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Is that for real?


26 posted on 08/19/2012 6:22:52 PM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Is there another article that is so poisonous that they will put this article on the cover so as to get more people to read something that would serve their diabolical purposes? They could put out just a single article criticizing Obama, among hundred that lift him up, if they want to bait people into read something even more rotten to the core inside the mag. Watch for the old bait and switch tactic. I haven’t looked at the mag, but this scenario is possible with the dirty left. What are the other articles in the issue about, anything major?


27 posted on 08/19/2012 6:49:18 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

If I see it - I’ll buy it... might as well send a message...


29 posted on 08/19/2012 7:04:39 PM PDT by GOPJ (Politics is war without bloodshed, and war is politics with bloodshed. - Mao Tse Tung. We're at war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54
Fair warning: I'm posting through the haze of a couple of large glasses of wine. Isn't Newsweek the rag that is set to go online only? Ten-to-one says there is an big push inside this issue alerting people about the big move online, and they want as wide an audience as possible for the announcement. Probably some "one month free" enticement too.

Let them die. Newsweek should be a trivia question along with U.S. News and World Report in the category of Famous Newsmagazines that Drove Themselves into Oblivion by Shamlessly Kissing the Unmentionables of Liberal Asshats.
33 posted on 08/19/2012 7:22:24 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Let them die. I for one will never patronize any liberal establishment that I can avoid. They began the war, let’s end them.


34 posted on 08/19/2012 7:26:54 PM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

Let them die a horrible death. Put them in unemployment lines, like the rest of us. Let them eat Ramen Noodles.

I keep seeing their “We’re All Socialists, Now” cover, after Bath-House Barry’s installation.

Screw them.

Socialists,liberals and progressives should NOT benefit from the capitalism they HATE so vehemently.


37 posted on 08/19/2012 7:46:42 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveinOK54

No. Don’t buy it, but quote the article extensively in response to liberals on various news sites. For example, even Newsweek disagrees with you: “.....”

This would accomplish two things. First, it give you ammunition from someone ordinarily on their side. This is often very effective. Think of the times when they do the same, stating that a Republican supports a liberal bill.

Second, by making liberals aware of Newsweek’s apostasy, you make it less likely that they will buy the rag next week or the week after that (or subscribe to the online edition), thereby accelerating its downward slide into oblivion, where it deserves to go.

But if you do come up with any copies of the issue, leave them in waiting rooms, face up, so that others see them. Don’t give them a single dime though; you’ll just be feeding the dog that bit you, and will bite you again at the first chance. Mark my words, they are going to get a ton of cancellations this week from their 99% liberal subscribers. Anyone who is not a confirmed liberal stopped reading Newsweek years ago.


38 posted on 08/19/2012 8:31:51 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson