John Maynard Keynes was unavailable for comment.
Let's hope this isn't a subset of economist who are always "suprised" when their unemployment and other economic projections come back in an "unexpected" fashion.
(Have James Earl Jones begin reading text)
(Start foreboding music)
(Show pictures of starving children)
(Show granny being thrown over cliff)
But all 400 have ties to BIG OIL.
Do any of these economist strongly believe in Global Warming?
That was the first thing that popped into my head. Probably because whenever I hear a large number of “experts” agree on something that is the first thing that pops into my head.
The economists write that Romney’s plan is based on sound principles: “more contained and less intrusive federal government, a greater reliance on the private sector, a broad expansion of opportunity without government favors for special interests, and respect for the rule of law including the decision-making authority of states and localities.”
Greater reliance on the private sector? How about getting the feds out of everything but what is outlined in the USC?
And respect for the rule of law..???
How about applying the rule of law? And, even more importantant..complying with the ROL or suffer REAL consequences?
I’m affraid that the Obammunist has lowered the bar so low that even a half effort will be haralded as a major accomplishment.
I hope Team Romney is downplaying what they really have to do in order to make it palatable in the knucklehead public? Once they get in office then they can begin to GUT and ROUT Spending and bloated govvernment.
But I’m not holding my breath.
A few public hangings would be refreshing..:)
Thanks for this thread.