This is amazing!
Folks are demanding that an adamantly pro-life nominee should withdraw. Why aren’t these same folks demanding the withdrawal of Romney, an (as yet) unnominated candidate with a pro-abortion history?
Akin will do better in his race than Romney will do in his doomed presidential candidacy. In two weeks, no one will remember exactly what Akin said; they will remember only that he is pro-life at all times in all cases. In two weeks, Romney will still be Romney, a loser.
Wake up, folks!
Red herring. His pro-life beliefs have nothing do with it. It was his ignorant comment concerning legitimate rape and pregnancy that has him in hot water. You can be pro-life without saying stupid things about rape.
The mainstream media have gleefully pulled the "RAPE" card. We conservatives should recognize this for what this is: There is no real issue, no real "outrage" over what Akin said. In fact, what Akin said is generally true, albeit inartfully said.
This is amazing! Folks are demanding that an adamantly pro-life nominee should withdraw.Thank you both for your commentary and thread. The left doesn't have to publicly dismiss Akin, because the right is doing all the work for them. It's a tragedy, but I believe Akin's comment was no "coincidence." All who believe in Christ, know that rarely is so. Because now Romney jumped on the bandwagon re-outing NOT ONLY himself but evidently converting Ryan (who was 100% pro-life) as a baby-killer too (in cases of rape). Monstrous!!!! Pray the Republican Convention rocks out a true pro-life conservative, cancelling the Mitt pick. And pray Paul runs for the hills. He doesn't belong with Romney.