Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

Just why do Social Security “agents” need to be armed? I would assume they are all just bureaucrats and not law enforcement officers so why have them armed? If there is some crime or suspected crime wouldn’t they be working with the FBI or even local police? This is scary.


12 posted on 08/20/2012 8:35:44 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Great RJ
Just why do Social Security “agents” need to be armed?

Because high-stakes fraud happens, and police aren't versed in nuances of the Social Security law someone needs to know to take down a felon-in-progress and not lose key evidence in the process. Those agents are citizens too, and have a right to defend themselves while doing what sometimes is, in fact, a dangerous job. That there's a team of FBI agents present may not be comforting when hot Pb starts flying.

Ditto other agencies. Sometimes they have to deal with serious criminals. I don't begrudge those agents being armed and training appropriately. NOAA, SSA, DHS, etc have a few branches that can get into sticky situations.

Justification does not, of course, preempt all curiosity and concerns though...

17 posted on 08/20/2012 8:43:57 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: The Great RJ
Just why do Social Security “agents” need to be armed?

to stop Paul Ryan from pushing granny off the cliff.

23 posted on 08/20/2012 8:56:46 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson