I'm afraid this could get very, very ugly.
Phillip Klein: Why Todd Akin should step aside; Updated: Akin vows to stay in race
Posted on August 20 2012 - 2:01 PM - Posted by: Doug Brady
Mary Beth and Steve have an excellent post on this and if you havent read it it yet, I urge you to do so. Phillip Klein makes some additional points today in a piece at the Washington Examiner. First Klein focuses on the sheer stupidity of Akins comments:
By now, anybody who follows politics enough to be reading this post has likely heard Missouri Republican U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akins idiotic and offensive statement when asked about whether abortion should be allowed in the case of rape. In case you need a refresher, Akin said, If its a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
Michelle Malkin has a good post ripping into Akin, deservedly so. A lot of the focus has been on the phrase legitimate rape. Was he trying to differentiate between violent/forcible rape and statutory rape? Was he suggesting marital rape or date rape arent legitimately rape? Was he trying to suggest that a lot of rapes are faked? His attempt to make such distinctions, to this observer, is offensive, but at the very minimum its unclear.
The second part of the statement, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down is sheer idiocy with no basis in science.
Excellent points. Im still trying to wrap my arms around his use of the term legitimate rape. Whats that mean? When is rape legitimate? As Mary Beth and Steve noted, there are growing calls from Republicans for Akin to step aside. Most of these calls have centered on electability issues: if Akin stays in the race, Claire McCaskill will pound Akin over his comments for the next 10 weeks, turning what was once a winnable election for the GOP into a referendum on when rape is or is not legitimate. Fantastic. This is how a golden opportunity to flip a Democrat Senate seat is lost. And lets not forget that prior to the August 7 primary, polling data consistently indicated Akin was the weakest of the three potential candidates the Republicans could field against McCaskill. In addition to the electability issue, though, Klein also notes another big problem with Akin: what happens in the unlikely event he someone holds on to beat McCaskill:
Politically, a lot of the analysis as to whether Akin should drop out of the race has focused on whether he could still recover from this horrendous statement and win. A more important question is what kind of senator Republicans would be getting if he could hang on and they could gain a majority in the Senate. Anybody capable of making a statement as simultaneously offensive and moronic as Akins is likely to make more such statements. That means, even if Akin wins, hes likely to embarrass his party for six years and undermine the pro-life cause.
Exactly. Not only will the cause be undermined, but the Democrat Party will have been given more ammo in their ceaseless the GOP hates women campaign. Indeed Akins comments have the potential to negatively impact other GOP races in this crucial election year. The Democrat Party is desperate to change the subject from their disastrous stewardship of the economy, and Akins continued presence in the race will doubtless be viewed by them as the gift that keeps on giving. The only recourse for Republicans is for Akin to drop out, and do so immediately. Klein adds his name to that chorus:
Missouri Republicans have other choices. Both Sarah Steelman and John Brunner led troubled Democratic incumbent Sen. Claire McCaskill in polls taken during the GOP primary, and both were closer to the Tea Party than Akin (Steelman was endorsed by Sarah Palin). If Akin drops out of the race by tomorrow, the Missouri GOP could still pick another candidate. Akin has caused enough damage already. He should do the right thing and step aside and make room for somebody else while theres still time.
Obviously Sarah Steelman is my choice, but even Brunner is preferable to Akin. Will he drop out? I hope so, but I think thats a long shot at best. Most politicians are in the game for their own self-aggrandizement, and Ive seen no indication that Akin is an exception. Hell likely stay in till the bitter end, and help Democrats keep Dingy Harry in charge of the Senate calendar. I hope Im wrong.
Update: Big surprise. Akin just told the Huckster (who, naturally, endorsed Akin) that he will remain in the race till the aforementioned bitter end. And bitter it will be. For all of us. Via the Washington Post:
Rep. Todd Akin said Monday that he will not give in to calls for him to end his Missouri Senate campaign after his controversial comments about legitimate rape.
Im not a quitter. My belief is were going to move this thing forward, he said during an appearance Monday afternoon on Mike Huckabees radio show. To quote my friend John Paul Jones, Ive not yet begun to fight.
Akin also said he still sees himself as the right candidate to take on Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), even as many Republicans have begun to doubt it. He apologized for his remarks but said it doesnt mean he should end his campaign.
I hate when Im right. Sometimes.
“To quote my friend John Paul Jones, Ive not yet begun to fight.”
His friend. I know someone will defend him as they tried on another thread.
Jone Paul Jones passed in 1792.