Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nhwingut
Santroum artfully handled this verey same question in the primaries. He discussed the Supreme Court ruling that shot down a Louisiana law making rape a capital crime, and asked why an innocent child resulting from a rape should be subject to death, but the rapist be protected by law.

Santorum didn't deny that pregnancy could result from rape, but he boldly framed it in terms of wanting to compound one act of violence with another.

I guess Akin wasn't paying attention.

7 posted on 08/20/2012 11:43:58 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

“Santroum artfully handled this verey same question in the primaries. He discussed the Supreme Court ruling that shot down a Louisiana law making rape a capital crime, and asked why an innocent child resulting from a rape should be subject to death, but the rapist be protected by law.

Santorum didn’t deny that pregnancy could result from rape, but he boldly framed it in terms of wanting to compound one act of violence with another.”

~ ~ ~

He is a good man, most likely in the “state of grace.”
Santorum could always express himself very well, God helped him.

No need of a teleprompter.


18 posted on 08/20/2012 12:40:59 PM PDT by stpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson