Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DSH
USADA also said it had 10 former Armstrong teammates ready to testify against him. . . . [T]he agency has refused to say who they are or specifically what they would say.

It's hard to prepare cross-examination and rebuttal experts when the prosecution won't disclose their evidence and witnesses. He's been fighting these allegations since 1999 and has endured a 2-year federal investigation.

The situation makes me think of endlessly battling the IRS or some other behemoth federal agency -- they'll keep hounding you with unlimited resources until you crack. If he had persisted and the USADA didn't succeed in their quest this time, I don't believe for a second they wouldn't turn around and try again. And again. And again.

This is more akin to not answering the tenth complaint arising from the same set of facts. I can't even figure out what axe the USADA has to grind by pursuing this issue into perpetuity.

28 posted on 08/23/2012 9:13:29 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: FoxInSocks

Hey, how else are these people going to keep the gravy rolling in if they don’t go after people like Armstrong forever? Have to justify their existence somehow.


32 posted on 08/23/2012 9:26:20 PM PDT by ResponseAbility (The beauty of liberalism is that the stupid can feel smart, the lazy can feel entitled, and the immo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: FoxInSocks

“It’s hard to prepare cross-examination and rebuttal experts when the prosecution won’t disclose their evidence and witnesses”

They didn’t say Armstrong didn’t have that list, just that the public didn’t.


43 posted on 08/23/2012 10:01:42 PM PDT by WILLIALAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: FoxInSocks
It's hard to prepare cross-examination and rebuttal experts when the prosecution won't disclose their evidence and witnesses. He's been fighting these allegations since 1999 and has endured a 2-year federal investigation.

You apparently don't understand the arbitration process. The panel of three arbitrators, as in most arbitrations, has the authority to direct the USADA to diclose the names of the witnessess, a summary of the testimony, and each exhibit that it intends to offer to prove its case way in advance of the arbitration hearing. The panel of arbitrators also has the authority to allow Armstrong to inspect and test documents and physical evidence and to depose the USADA witnesses under oath well in advance of the arbitration.

In my three decades of experience as both an attorney advocate in arbitration proceedings and as an arbitrator, the arbitration process is fair and objective and in many cases more so than the judical system. If you want to know why, then I'll explain in another post.

72 posted on 08/24/2012 4:08:18 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: FoxInSocks

Well-said bump!


176 posted on 08/24/2012 3:27:56 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: FoxInSocks
Indeed, the question is....what would be the USADA's motivation here? I mean, it's not like Armstrong is a Christian Conservative or anything.

"This is more akin to not answering the tenth complaint arising from the same set of facts. I can't even figure out what axe the USADA has to grind by pursuing this issue into perpetuity."

177 posted on 08/24/2012 3:29:50 PM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson