At least we have brushed the foam off the beer and are down to the real issue that you are frustrated because serious conservatives refuse to be Romney pom pom girls. Being relatively new to conservatism, you are in a panic over Obozo and hoping against hope that even something named Romney will stave off the wolf for four years. Then what? More Romney? Maybe we could run a ticket of Olympia Snowe and Mike Castle? Maybe nominate Hillary (Medusa herself) and Charlie Manson so that "we" can win!!! Its just the latest GOP version of the quadrennial DIRE EMERGENCY to scare the troubled rabbits back into line behind the latest purveyor of greed for the trust funders and provider of contracts and riches to the GOP-E and protection for the fudgepackers and babykillers while issuing pious pronunciamentos in denial of the grisly reality that is the accommodationist GOP. I don't have a horse in that race either at least as to trust funds and contracts and no one who is pro-life or pro-marriage has a major party horse in this race either.
I was listening to some montage of statements by Ronaldus Maximus on Mark Levin's show tonight. The one that struck me was something to the effect that Reagan hoped that after he was dead, he hoped to be remembered for appealing to our better instincts. He succeeded at that and is also remembered for his strength, his grace and courage under fire, his genuine personal humility and consideration (mopping up his spilled urine while recovering from the assassination attempt rather than expecting a nurse or orderly to do that), his remarkable spontaneous sense of humor and for being, by far, the best POTUS and best human being in that office in our lifetimes.
And yes, I realize that Mark Levin (almost my contemporary in Young Americans for Freedom), Hannity (a wind tunnel who continually proves that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing compared to adequate knowledge) and to a lesser extent El Rushbo are all falling all over themselves to lead the quadrennial panic.
Romney needed some coverage for his naked pro-death career if he was going to gull the suckers and run for POTUS. So he CLAIMED to have become pro-life in reaction to the embryonic stem cell issue. This is analogous to someone like Obozo CLAIMING to become a born again fiscal conservative because he refused to pay the tab (out of gummint or campaign funds) for local police protection at his Westport, CT, fundraiser a month or two ago. No credibility in either case whatsoever. As to Obozo, he isn't fiscally conservative, like most leftists, he is simply too cheap to pay his own bills. He is taking it to a new level by refusing to pay out of campaign funds or even out of federal government funds. Golly, it is like the days when LBJ ordered a policy of turning out most White House lights at night to, ummm, save money.
As to Romney (the more serious question since we expect more of GOP candidates), hallucinating that he did become "pro-life" over the mini-issue of embryonic stem cells being farmed for infanticidally selfish adults, please to explain his cramming $50 abortions into Romneycare and putting Planned Barrenhood on its board TWO YEARS after he CLAIMS to have become "pro-life." Did he Etch another Sketch??? Was he physically captured by Demonrats, tortured, and forced at gunpoint to include those $50 abortions or was being a Myth of Destiny on "health care" and sucking up for approval from the Boston Globe and its owner the New York Times and SeeBS, NBC, ABC, et al. (Isn't Romney WONDERFUL? He is just like us!!! The leftist establishment chants in one voice. Now that he is GOP nominee, not so much) soooooo important to Myth that he sold the babies' lives and his soul down the river in spite of being "pro-life" and banking (one should pardon the expression) that GOP-E money applied liberally enough in the way of mega slander campaigns would cover his tracks??? I'm going with the last alternative. Remember Occam's Razor??? The simplest answer is likely the correct one when considering multiple explanations?
Ohhhh, be still my beating heart! Myth is a "capitalist," is he? Well, if vulture capitalism counts, I suppose so. Can we dare hope to touch the hem of his garment? Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are capitalists too and both are a darn sight more successful than Willard but I don't want either of them (both are leaving their estates to Planned Barrenhood according to their own published statements and are moral monstrosities) running my country either. Let's leave the baby butchering where it belongs, in the Demonratic Party, along with support for "gay" everything, gun grabbing, weak kneed foreign policy, and an economic policy that favors ONLY the wealthy trust fund babies (why DO so many megabucks boodlers support Obozo? Are they "Marxists" too? Or is Obozo gulling the suckers as well? Again, Occam's Razor) and the ever growing welfare class?
If you don't think we can handle four more years (which you are going to get no matter which of these enemies of civilization "wins" in November), have you chosen your new country yet?
In appointing the usual gang (or maybe a truly UNUSUAL gang) of GOP-E airheads to the courts (with GOP Senators panting to please him as they would not for Obozo), maybe Romney will ultimately be responsible for MORE innocents murdered than was Hitler. How many David Souters, Sandra Day O'Connors, William Brennans, Earl Warrens, John Paul Stevens, Lewis Powells and Herod Blackmuns must the GOP-E put on the SCOTUS to convince you of their homicidal intent toward babies of modest means? You want to talk "class warfare?" That's the real class warfare and it has taken 55 million lives to date. Of course, Obozo is no better and that is the problem. At least GOP senators will tie up his nominees. If they stay in continuous session, they can prevent recess appointments. It only requires a senator or two to stay in Washington to keep the senate in session.
Now, as to your final question, I am convinced that God protects drunks, cripples and the USA (not necessarily in that order). He will provide IF He still wants this nation to survive. If He doesn't, nothing you or I can do will stay His judgment. Before I sell you on anything, you will have to get your head together on issues and agendas. That is how we spent sixteen years being ridiculed while building the force that nominated and elected Ronaldus Maximus. It was not easy but it was well worth doing. Ask those freed from the gulag archipelago. Ask Russian Jews who were freed to go to Israel. Ask Nicaraguans who were freed (at least for a time) from Danny Ortega. Ask the American medical students rescued in Granada. Ask Cubans who had fled Castro. In 1984 and 1988, we WERE BETTER OFF than we had been in 1980, by a long shot. And we did not get there by cowering in a corner hoping not to be noticed. And we survived Jimmuh Peanut and drove him from office in well-deserved disgrace, having, truth be known, let Ford be beaten although I am ashamed to admit I voted for that brainless POS but I was young and foolish then. I won't be foolish again.
Finally, have you ever read the ravings of Margaret Higgins Sanger, founding mother (she should pardon the expression) of Planned Barrenhood? Try her Pivot of Civilization and her constant example of a mythical Brooklyn Jewish lady named Sadie overburdened by all those children and in need of being saved from having more, or the works of her far more talented propagandist, Dr. Lothrop Stoddard, a Harvard alumnus, her "official" and enthusiastic observer at the Nazi Eugenics courts for her American Birth Control League which later became Planned Barrenhood) at the Nazi eugenics courts). He wrote any number of despicable works. One was entitled: The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy. Also check on books like The Passing of the Great Race by another of her chums, Madison Grant, an alumnus of Yale and Columbia Law School. That book was used as a defense exhibit at Nuremberg to justify the murder of your relatives See the Legacy section on Wikipedia for Madison Grant as a reference to that. Hitler called it his "bible" in a letter to Grant. Check both Stoddard and Grant out on Wikipedia.
If and when you familiarize yourself with these monsters, ask yourself why elitist Myth has been so chummy with them over the years. Then you will have an easier time with the term Mittler.
BTW, did you know that there were abortionists convicted of crimes against humanity at Nuremberg? Google: Nuremberg Trials/Abortion and look for the link to Human Life International's "Facts of Life: Chapter 5: The Holocaust Analogy to Abortion. HLI is a sober and quite respectable pro-life group.
May you read the sources I have offered you and may you be blessed!
or carter locking thermostats down because of global cooling? Liked to froze to death at the factory I was working at because of it. We wore winter coats, hats, 2 pairs of socks, and knit gloves with the finger tips cut off so we could do our work in doors
Once the GOP makes it clear that they will go against the Pro-Life plank of it's platform there will be no turning back. Once they start supporting Pro-Abortion candidates then there is no more bench mark of differentiation between the GOP and the DNC and they lost the rights to the most important argument for being Pro-Life is we protect life and the unalienable rights of our citizen and especially those people that have no voice and can not defend themselves. That all men are created equal you know that Declaration of Independence thingy they don’t want to deal with anymore because of Mitt’s Pro-Abortion stance. There will be no where the GOP can turn because they are now guilty of shredding the Constitutional rights of the people and are ok with freely throwing other people’s lives away for political expediency. It would seem they are Ok with death panels just so long as it is not Obama’s death panels.
Bottom line is they can’t defend Mitt based on his record how in the heck are they going to convince the rest of the American public to vote for him? Spin just does not go as far as it used too so the best they can do is run the old canard of quadrennial Dire Emergency but the only problem is they are pitting one liberal progressive agenda up against another liberal progressive agenda making 4 year scare factor moot.
You are so right on that they can not even trot out the argument of What about Supreme Court Nominations because it doesn't hold any water because of Mittler’s own track record.