Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OPS4

Let’s go back to the post I responded to in the first place.

This is the comment at post #4 I responded to: “Another small difference is that Mitt Romney is no Ronald Reagan!”

I responded with this post: “Exactly! He’s far from a Ronald Reagan, and that’s worth a few worry wrinkles IMO.”

Later I responded to Post #6 which was nonsense about pissin’, and moanin’ not going to get us through the election, as though that was the discussion with this post: “You have a problem with a statement of fact?”

So, now that you know what the original discussion was all about perhaps you could clue me in as to what your comment means relative to that.


27 posted on 09/04/2012 10:31:01 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: rockinqsranch

Read it is self explanatory, Choice, Romney over Obama is all we need to make sure of, unless you would rather vote for a corrupt President like Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftvbxSEFJM8


35 posted on 09/05/2012 8:51:37 AM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!Jesus is Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson