Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada closes embassy in Iran
Fox News ^ | 09/07/2012

Posted on 09/07/2012 11:14:20 AM PDT by LadyEleanor

Canada's Conservative government said Friday it is shutting its embassy in Tehran and severing diplomatic relations with Iran, which Canada says is providing military assistance to Syria.

Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said that the Canadian embassy in Tehran will close immediately and Iranian diplomats in Canada have been given five days to leave.

Baird, who serves in a government that is a staunch ally of Israel, said Iran is the most significant threat to global peace and security in the world today.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Canada; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; glassiransass; iran; israel; notbreakingnews; threatmatrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: LadyEleanor
Strange that Canada would cite Iran's participation in the Syrian conflict. The Assad government is integral to Iranian national security. NATO doctrine may contain a threat assessment tripwire that Iran's WMD programs alone don't reach. But if you add Iranian troops fighting outside their own border the test for NATO action is satisfied. I'm just speculating but if Obama planned an October surprise having Europe in his corner would be a big help.
21 posted on 09/07/2012 1:50:36 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyEleanor

Why the RUSH to close it down? (sarc)


22 posted on 09/07/2012 2:42:07 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyEleanor

Haaretz is quoting Def Min Ehud Barak as moving away from a unilateral attack on Iran. There may be some significant division between the hawkish Bibi and Barak. If so, there will be no attack until the internal differences are resolved. Acting without Barak’s support destroys the ruling coalition and throws everything into question. Barak is genuinely seen as an Israeli military hero and even a personage as large and historic as Bibi would be unlikely to ignore him on so vital a matter.


23 posted on 09/07/2012 2:49:27 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R

Canada and Israel join forces to do what Obastard refuses to do.


24 posted on 09/07/2012 2:52:44 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LadyEleanor

Probably a very good idea. At least we don’t have one to close.


25 posted on 09/07/2012 3:37:34 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Isn’t breaking off diplomatic relations something you do when you’re very close to going to war? What if there was a war and the United States wasn’t invited? Yeah, right.


26 posted on 09/07/2012 3:40:18 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Just as in the 1967 war, the US government may be against them but the people are with them. It SUCKS because it led to the tragedy of the USS Liberty, but people have to remember, US policy was anti-Israel, and they probably WERE spying for the Gyps or the House of Saud. Probably not the Saudis, because as Wahabbists they HATED us then, and they hate us now. Our relationship is purely pecuniary.


27 posted on 09/07/2012 3:46:34 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Yes. Or:

1) If you think your diplomats are in danger because the host regime cannot or will not guarantee their safety. Probably true in this case.

2) You don't want the other country's diplomats in your country because of activities they are engaging in. Probably true in this case.

3) The other country is engaging in gross human rights abuses and/or has committed crimes against your citizens. True in this case.

4) You have reason to believe that your allies might engage in hostilities against the host nation soon. Probably true in this case.

So, there are several reasons to break off relations. Canada has had recent diplomatic problems with several mid east governments, notably:

1) Gaddafi's Libyan regime. PM Harper went so far as to refuse the dictator's request for landing and refueling privileges when he departed New York for Europe. The RCAF later participated in the Libyan operation.

2) Dubai, which tried to blackmail Canada in exchange for "allowing" the Canadian armed forces to continue to operate a logistics base for the Afghan operation. Canada closed the base and told them to go f*ck themselves.

3) The Canadian embassy in Iran was closed before, in 1980, to facilitate the repatriation of 6 American diplomats under Canadian protection. I think the Iranians are still smarting about that one, but we know who are friends are.

4) Canada was involved in Afghanistan for 10 years and took 158 fatalities. I don't think the taliban, AQ, or their allies like us much.

Even a small power doesn't have to be pushed around by thug regimes if you don't need their oil.

28 posted on 09/07/2012 4:11:44 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

They have seen the light...


29 posted on 09/07/2012 4:13:36 PM PDT by Shady (The Tea Party is the Party of the American People, Working and creating wealth in SPITE of OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

They have seen the light...


30 posted on 09/07/2012 4:13:36 PM PDT by Shady (The Tea Party is the Party of the American People, Working and creating wealth in SPITE of OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

They have seen the light...


31 posted on 09/07/2012 4:13:41 PM PDT by Shady (The Tea Party is the Party of the American People, Working and creating wealth in SPITE of OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

They have seen the light...


32 posted on 09/07/2012 4:13:41 PM PDT by Shady (The Tea Party is the Party of the American People, Working and creating wealth in SPITE of OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Disinformation perhaps?


33 posted on 09/07/2012 4:14:46 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Shady

Do you think they’ve seen the light?


34 posted on 09/07/2012 4:19:48 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

Because they are Taking Care of Business


35 posted on 09/07/2012 4:31:01 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

A dark night. No moon. Let all hell just break loose. End it in 5 hours. I have spoken! Make it so.


36 posted on 09/07/2012 4:55:16 PM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama - Can you afford to keep him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

From Haaretz?? I doubt that very much.


37 posted on 09/07/2012 5:03:20 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BlessingsofLiberty

obama doesn’t care, and neither do his worshippers, if he’s caught in a lie. So, why would they leave Ju as the capital of Israel out of the platform? Does anyone believe putting it back in is going to make any difference?


38 posted on 09/07/2012 5:05:59 PM PDT by Terry Mross (2016 THE MOVIE....scarier than any zombie movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
>"Even a small power doesn't have to be pushed around by thug regimes if you don't need their oil. "

And that Ladies and Gentlemen is why the Sauds have bought and owned our "Representatives" for the past 50 years!

39 posted on 09/07/2012 5:06:13 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a Barack 0b0tt0my!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Indeed.


40 posted on 09/07/2012 6:08:30 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson