It's clearly coordinated, but it's not helping Obama - it's making him look really Incompetent. Payback on 9/11 for the bin Laden mission, with rage exacerbated by Obama's convention gloating and John Wayne impersonation as the hero who finished off OBL.
Who would he make war on? The governments he and Hillary helped to empower? That would make him look even worse than he does already.
He goes on to that it would be ironic if the Obama administration was found to be apologizing for Iranian disinformation.
I imagine the White House has CNN on the phone right now telling them to drop the coverage.
There were attacks at or near elections, or in first year of new POTUS in 1993, 2000 and 2001 (among many other well-known attacks). There seems to be a pattern. Attack when US is seen as weakest or there is uncertainty.
Good points, but we are dealing with people known for not looking at the whole picture before they launch their projects, and reap the unforeseen consequences of their lack of due diligence. There have been many a comment over the years about the Democrat’s “Wile E. Coyoteisms”.
Perhaps they are desperate, and focused upon that old cliche about never losing an election while at war, while in conflict, and persuing that as an election aid with the help of their MB allies. (I do believe the Left, and the Muslim Brotherhood are in alliance.)
Muslim’s seem to not care about human life, thus collateral damage means nothing to them, and the Left of which Obama represents has stated their crude perspective of collateral damage in the recent past.
I put these thoughts, and others together, and I see a possibility of some form of conflict arising in time to aid Obama’s electability in the eyes of those responsible to get him reelected.