Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/16/2012 9:32:29 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

This guy is a narcissist of the first order. If you have ever known one, they belive their own lies and are extremely manipulative.


2 posted on 09/16/2012 10:12:47 PM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; stylecouncilor; windcliff

“Acid is groovy. Kill the pigs.”

Guilty. No one could be that lame, except him.


4 posted on 09/16/2012 10:49:40 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I read “Fatal Vision” a long time ago. Thought he was guilty until the end. Then I realized that the author was a manipulator.

The author is the same one who has been harassing Sarah Palin. Let's see what the new DNA evidence shows.

8 posted on 09/17/2012 1:29:41 AM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

From reviews I’d read about the new book on the case, I started thinking McDonald was railroaded since, for example, there really was a girl in a floppy hat who confessed to being in the house.

Then I read this interesting column http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/09/15/2345752/jeffrey-macdonald-had-a-breaking.html Here’s the money quote about an afternoon he spent with Helena Stoeckley: “After she said she suffered panic attacks every time she drove by the murder scene, which she apparently often did, I offered to take her to Fort Bragg myself. We drove to 544 Castle Drive and parked on the street. I didn’t tell her that was the MacDonald apartment, assuming she’d recognize it, especially with the boarded-up windows and her panic attacks.

Nothing. No reaction. She had no idea where she was. She was a pathetic seeker of attention and approval, even if she had to lie to get it.”


13 posted on 09/17/2012 12:01:01 PM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Sarah has a lot of facts in this article. She doesn't claim MacDonald is innocent, but she thinks there is a good possibility that he was railroaded by McGuinness.

I think anyone reading her article below would wait to see where the new evidence points before being absolutely sure that MacDonald was guilty.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/09/17/Did-Joe-McGinniss-Condemn-an-Innocent-Man

15 posted on 09/18/2012 5:24:46 AM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson