Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney: 47% Of Americans Will Vote for Obama No Matter What
Townhall.com ^ | September 17, 2012 | Kevin Glass

Posted on 09/18/2012 3:37:16 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2012 3:37:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
According to the American Research Group, Obama leads Romney among voters under age 50 while Romney leads Obama among voters under age 50 and above. http://americanresearchgroup.com/. Seems the age of accountability and reason has bumped to 50 and older.

So what happened 50 years ago (1962)? What caused this change from a brave and ardent love of freedom to a weak acquiescence to socialist tyranny? How were children raised and educated after 1962 that caused this incredible shift? How did public schools go from education that included the Bible and prayer to socialist indoctrination run by socialist-loving teacher unions?

One may point to many reasons, but something socially, morally, and legally significant and catastrophic happened in 1962, and hardly anyone noticed it at the time. Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), the famous “establishment” case of “separation of church and state,” outlawed prayer in public schools. As Justice Stewart wrote in his dissent, “the Court says that in permitting school children to say this simple prayer, the New York authorities have established ‘an official religion’” (Engel, 370 U.S. 421).

This is where misapplication of the establishment clause to create “separation of church and state” has taken us – to the brink of Marxist tyranny, the destruction of the freedoms protected by our Constitutional Republic, and economic collapse. The fact is, the First Amendment of the Constitution NEVER RESTRICTS FREE AND PEACEFUL RELIGIOUS EXERCISE in government, out of government, or anywhere else. The Constitution ONLY RESTRICTS THE STATE from either establishing religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Many Christians are confused about this and have allowed the other side to dictate the terms and results in the fight for freedom. The issue today is not an establishment issue, not even close. The issue is the socialists’ use of a Jeffersonian metaphor (“separation of church and state”) in place of the text and meaning of the Constitution to push Christianity and Constitutional free exercise and expression out of government and public life. If God’s people at the foundation of our country were so timid about instilling the things of God in government, we never would have had, for example, the government buildings as well as monuments in Washington D.C. with scripture carved in stone. These artifacts as well as the Constitution itself testify against lie of “the separation of church and state” embraced by our popular culture.

The health of a government DEPENDS ON THE free exercise of religion evidenced by the history of America, probably the healthiest form of government in history. The Book of Revelation in the Bible begins with describing how God's presence is in the midst of his people, the church(es) (Rev. 1:12-3:22). It ends with a description of God's presence in the midst of His people, the holy city, the New Jerusalem (Rev 22:2). In the midst of God’s people is a "tree of life," the leaves of which are "for the healing of the nations."

We, the church, institutionally and individually, have God's life and healing so desperately needed in the nations including America. The history of our nation reflects a direct relationship between the involvement of God’s people in government as well as society, and the health of our country that has flourished with individual liberty. Separating the church from the state is like separating the doctor from the patient or the medicine from the wounded. It’s up to God’s people to muster the courage and resolve to get this medicine back into the bloodstream of the dying patient.

2 posted on 09/18/2012 3:40:05 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The MSM is doing their best to try to make this the game breaking gaffe.

The sad truth is Romney is correct.


3 posted on 09/18/2012 3:50:36 AM PDT by Vinnie (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

This is exactly what we are facing. Romney is absolutely right in his assessment. Unless we can convince some of the 47% that the right thing to do is to vote responsibly for Romney, we, as a nation, are doomed! We are on the verge of abject socialism-marxism. Yes, it is nice to get a nice gov’t check at the expense of other hard working people, but for the sake of our country and our children stop this now and vote for free enterprise!


4 posted on 09/18/2012 3:51:02 AM PDT by 2nd Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

Great and informative post. Thanks for posting


5 posted on 09/18/2012 3:51:36 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I had to turn Romney off last night

What a colorless fool

At least explained his lofty goal. To get 50.1% of the vote by aiming his campaign at 4% of the electorate who are “undecided”

How inspiring. He puts the fate of our nation in the hands of 4% of the people who are such idiots they cannot decide who to vote for, or are going to vote for obama and are ashamed to admit it

With our nation in grave peril, he showed less passion than a man arguing to the city council why he should be allowed to trim the trees on his lot

6 posted on 09/18/2012 3:52:14 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

I wonder if that number includes people who are on Social Security. If so, I bet there are many who do not support the current Administration.


7 posted on 09/18/2012 3:53:29 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

Time for Team Romney to step up and drive this home. It’s the perfect opportunity to say that there’s no other explanation for people supporting a President who’s presiding over an economy of high unemployment, $4-plus gas prices and a foreign policy that is literally in flames in all the places where he and his Secretary of State actively supported the forces now attacking our embassies.


8 posted on 09/18/2012 3:54:16 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Now cast your votes sheeeeeeeple!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekQSpbwKkdg&list=PL08FD35E184A24E7F&index=0&feature=plcp


9 posted on 09/18/2012 3:55:56 AM PDT by gotribe (WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Until we discover a cure for stupidity, we will be in this predicament for a long time.


10 posted on 09/18/2012 3:59:10 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd Amendment
"Unless we can convince some of the 47% that the right thing to do is to vote responsibly for Romney, we, as a nation, are doomed!"

Who is “we”? Did you watch Romney's “speech” last night? He is not trying to convince those people. He concedes them to obama. His goal is to reach the 4% that still claim to be undecided. His goal is 50.1% of the vote. Set low goals and maybe you'll achieve them? Romney is flawed as a politician. Deeply flawed. A colorless passionless man. The glow his wife tried to give him at the convention, to show him as more than a Stepford politician, is fading I can't imagine many of us will be voting for Romney. At best we will be voting against obama. God help our nation.

11 posted on 09/18/2012 3:59:17 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's likely an offshoot of the conservative talking point that 47% of Americans don't pay income taxes. Which is true! But unfortunately, a lot of conservatives make the leap from there to claim that total tax burden isn't high enough on middle- and lower-income people (without taking into account things like sales and payroll taxes) and that either they should pay more taxes or we should slash social spending.

Contrary to the author's assertion that the 47% not paying federal income taxes does not translate to 'on the government dole,' I completely disagree. NOT having to pay income taxes, moreover the large percentage of this 47% actually getting ETIC money back they never paid in, is 'on the government dole' in my book.

They simply are not paying their fair share for the expense of running the government, wasteful as it is.

I was in Walmart a couple of weeks ago. Two heifers with kids were blocking the produce aisle talking about deals, etc. As they parted, one said to the other "we have to stick together until November". The dumb one said "what?" ...the other said "you know, until the election". Both later checked out with WICs certificates and EBT cards - paid not one red cent for a full cart of groceries. These are the 47%.

12 posted on 09/18/2012 3:59:57 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster
Yes, the 47% does include those on SS. But I believe a lot more than 50% of those know better than to ride the bridge to 'no where' and will vote against that incompent clown in the White House.
13 posted on 09/18/2012 4:01:34 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Our media loves to attack Romney for telling the truth. Romney was right to condemn the Cairo apology after our embassy flag was torn down and replaced with the al Quaida flag. The lame-streams did everything they could to protect Zero by going after Romney.

Once again Romney is being attacked for telling the truth. Obama has purposely created dependence on government to get votes. These 47% will vote for the guy who gives them free stuff. And it is Zero who looks at these people with contempt, not Romney. By making people dependent on government hand-outs, he is the architect of keeping people existing just above the poverty line, never aspiring for anything better.


14 posted on 09/18/2012 4:01:36 AM PDT by ShovelThemOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Oops...

incompent = incompetent

'morning fingers'

15 posted on 09/18/2012 4:03:12 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It was poorly stated and thus a gaffe. Retirees and those out of work are not lost to obama. What politician in their right mind writes off 47 percent of the vote?

What romney better say is that he has a plan to get americans working again. There are people in the 47 percent not by choice and are there because of obama. He has to get the focus on obama’s screwups and motivate people to his side - not attack them.


16 posted on 09/18/2012 4:06:23 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

I would tell Romney that a good leader CAN peel off a good percentage of that 47% if he can paint a picture of a better life in an America with a revitalized economy. There will always be moochers, but there are people who have lost hope too, and a good leader can flip those.

Dumb generalization. Reagan would have used that same stat to pivot toward his shining city on a hill.


17 posted on 09/18/2012 4:07:27 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The worst thing that could come from all this is for the Rats to put an ad together with some person saying “I don’t pay taxes and I’m voting for Romney.”

This changes nothing. Intelligent people have already made up their minds and will vote for Romney.


18 posted on 09/18/2012 4:07:41 AM PDT by ILS21R (The time is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

the MSM and the Obama campaign are going to go to town on this.. you aren’t going to be able to count all the sad stories of individual people and families who are getting some kind of government help because of no fault of their own and how Mitt Romney thinks they are all mooching bumbs... you can bet there will be loads of disabled veterans and old sick people popping up all over the Obama ads saying if it wasn’t for the government they would be living on the streets or dead... it’s not going to be pretty


19 posted on 09/18/2012 4:09:21 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
"I had to turn Romney off last night."

Same here. I can't take him anymore and I may sit this one out (election)
Our great country is going to collapse economically real soon. We can't keep spending money we don't have.
It might just be better if ZERO is in when it happens and HE gets the blame.
Meanwhile Deacon is buying precious metals. . . . . . . The precious metals will be sitting on (dry) Gunpowder.

20 posted on 09/18/2012 4:10:01 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Deacon sees the handwriting on the wall and is buying precious metals sitting on top of dry powder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson