HOWEVER; the bottom-line is that the Unionistas, Minorities, and sex deviates who are the Obamabase EAT IT UP, and they are the bulk of the 47% who don't pay taxes, nor do they want ANYTHING to mess with their flow of income/benefits/coddling, so they vote (D), religiously.....
I think that selective editing is pretty much the norm for Liberal campaigning.
For my money, it’s the same as libel and slander. I don’t know why it is tolerated to the extent that it is.
“Selectively edited, most-likely, for MAXIMUM Obamabot effect, and taken out of context in an illegal taping of his remarks.”
I had the feeling that a lot of people agreed with his remarks. What would you think would have been a proper context to make them more agreeable?